Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTZAX vs VIMSX
FTZAX vs VIMSX Comparison
Open Charts FTZAX vs VIMSX
FullerThaler Behvrll Uncnstd Eq A
Price$58.46
Change-$0.73 (-1.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets295.74M
Vanguard Mid Cap Index Investor
Price$78.42
Change-$1.34 (-1.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets198.55B
FTZAX vs VIMSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VIMSX has more cash in the bank: 199B vs. FTZAX (296M). VIMSX pays higher dividends than FTZAX: VIMSX (1.38) vs FTZAX (0.05). FTZAX was incepted earlier than VIMSX: FTZAX (4 years) vs VIMSX (28 years). FTZAX (1.58) is less costly to investors than VIMSX (0.17). FTZAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 19.00 vs. VIMSX (16.00). FTZAX has a lower initial minimum investment than VIMSX: FTZAX (1000) vs VIMSX (3000). FTZAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.58 vs. VIMSX (5.67).
| FTZAX | VIMSX | FTZAX / VIMSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 0.17 | 788% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.58 | 0.17 | 929% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.677 | 10.764 | 155% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 3000 | 33% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 296M | 199B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.05 | 1.38 | 4% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.58 | 5.67 | 204% |
| Returns for 3 years | 74.24 | 37.82 | 196% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 52.23 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 148.83 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement