Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTWO vs ICLN
FTWO vs ICLN Comparison
Open Charts FTWO vs ICLN
Strive Natural Resources and SecurityETF
Price$37.45
Change+$0.13 (+0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets43.65M
iShares Global Clean Energy ETF
Price$14.57
Change-$0.11 (-0.75%)
Volume$16.33K
Net Assets1.59B
FTWO vs ICLN Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTWO vs. ICLN commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTWO is a Buy and ICLN is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ICLN has more net assets: 1.59B vs. FTWO (43.7M). FTWO (30.509) and ICLN (30.367) have matching annual dividend yield . FTWO was incepted earlier than ICLN: FTWO (2 years) vs ICLN (17 years). ICLN (0.41) has a lower expense ratio than FTWO (0.49). ICLN has a higher turnover FTWO (27.00) vs FTWO (27.00).
| FTWO | ICLN | FTWO / ICLN | |
| Gain YTD | 30.509 | 30.367 | 100% |
| Net Assets | 43.7M | 1.59B | 3% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 0.41 | 120% |
| Turnover | 27.00 | 39.00 | 69% |
| Yield | 1.05 | 1.76 | 60% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 17 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FTWO | ICLN | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 68% | 4 days ago 75% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 71% | 4 days ago 89% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 4 days ago 88% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 78% | 4 days ago 85% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 68% | 4 days ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 4 days ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 21 days ago 70% | 7 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FTWO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FTWO has been loosely correlated with GE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FTWO jumps, then GE could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FTWO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FTWO | 100% | -0.47% | ||
| GE - FTWO | 66% Loosely correlated | -1.08% | ||
| BWXT - FTWO | 64% Loosely correlated | -0.09% | ||
| HWM - FTWO | 64% Loosely correlated | -0.74% | ||
| CNQ - FTWO | 62% Loosely correlated | -3.19% | ||
| OKE - FTWO | 61% Loosely correlated | -2.35% | ||
More | ||||
ICLN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ICLN has been closely correlated with FSLR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ICLN jumps, then FSLR could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ICLN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ICLN | 100% | +2.44% | ||
| FSLR - ICLN | 75% Closely correlated | +1.62% | ||
| SEDG - ICLN | 66% Loosely correlated | +0.76% | ||
| RUN - ICLN | 64% Loosely correlated | +10.65% | ||
| ENPH - ICLN | 63% Loosely correlated | +8.57% | ||
| CSIQ - ICLN | 62% Loosely correlated | +15.04% | ||
More | ||||