Advertisement
FTW vs KTH
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTW is a Buy and KTH is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FTW’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileKTH’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- FTW’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- KTH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FTW’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KTH’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- FTW’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.
- KTH’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
FTW (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а +0.19% price change this week, while KTH (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was +0.42% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was +0.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.45%, and the average quarterly price growth was +57.15%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Financial Conglomerates (+0.15% weekly)Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.
| FTW | KTH | FTW / KTH | |
| Capitalization | 471M | N/A | - |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.763 | 0.104 | 732% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Revenue | N/A | N/A | - |
| Total Cash | 40.7K | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | N/A | N/A | - |
FTW | KTH | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 30 | 88 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 28 Undervalued | 15 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 56 | 59 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
KTH's Valuation (15) in the null industry is in the same range as FTW (28). This means that KTH’s stock grew similarly to FTW’s over the last 12 months.
KTH's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as FTW (100). This means that KTH’s stock grew similarly to FTW’s over the last 12 months.
KTH's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as FTW (100). This means that KTH’s stock grew similarly to FTW’s over the last 12 months.
FTW's Price Growth Rating (56) in the null industry is in the same range as KTH (59). This means that FTW’s stock grew similarly to KTH’s over the last 12 months.
FTW's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as KTH (100). This means that FTW’s stock grew similarly to KTH’s over the last 12 months.
| FTW | KTH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 10% | 2 days ago 13% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 5% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 18% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 5% | 2 days ago 11% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 4% | 2 days ago 12% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 5 days ago 11% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 15% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 1% | N/A |
Advertisement
FTW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that FTW and OACC have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FTW and OACC's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FTW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FTW | 100% | N/A | ||
| OACC - FTW | 28% Poorly correlated | +0.38% | ||
| CAPN - FTW | 11% Poorly correlated | +1.21% | ||
| CUB - FTW | 11% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| KTH - FTW | 9% Poorly correlated | +1.12% | ||
| GIG - FTW | 3% Poorly correlated | +0.06% | ||
More | ||||
KTH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that KTH and KVACU have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KTH and KVACU's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To KTH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KTH | 100% | +1.12% | ||
| KVACU - KTH | 21% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| EICA - KTH | 21% Poorly correlated | -0.22% | ||
| HNNA - KTH | 21% Poorly correlated | -1.12% | ||
| TRIN - KTH | 21% Poorly correlated | -2.85% | ||
| BCSF - KTH | 20% Poorly correlated | -2.13% | ||
More | ||||