Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTVZX vs JVMCX
FTVZX vs JVMCX Comparison
Open Charts FTVZX vs JVMCX
FullerThaler Behav Md-Cp Val R6
Price$34.15
Change-$0.09 (-0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets407.25M
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap C
Price$27.37
Change-$0.04 (-0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets23.59B
FTVZX vs JVMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTVZX vs. JVMCX commentary
Aug 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTVZX is a Buy and JVMCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMCX has more cash in the bank: 23.6B vs. FTVZX (407M). FTVZX pays higher dividends than JVMCX: FTVZX (1.53) vs JVMCX (0.00). FTVZX was incepted earlier than JVMCX: FTVZX (8 years) vs JVMCX (14 years). JVMCX (1.88) is less costly to investors than FTVZX (0.87). JVMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. FTVZX (33.00). JVMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTVZX: JVMCX (1000) vs FTVZX (1000000). FTVZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.92 vs. JVMCX (-1.23). FTVZX return over 5 years is better than : 84.80 vs. JVMCX (45.07).
| FTVZX | JVMCX | FTVZX / JVMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 1.87 | 40% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 1.88 | 46% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.500 | 8.182 | 6% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 407M | 23.6B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.53 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.92 | -1.23 | -156% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.16 | 10.16 | 139% |
| Returns for 5 years | 84.80 | 45.07 | 188% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 40.17 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers