Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTVSX vs JVMCX
FTVSX vs JVMCX Comparison
Open Charts FTVSX vs JVMCX
FullerThaler Behav Md-Cp Val Instl
Price$33.26
Change+$0.06 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets364.33M
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap C
Price$26.89
Change-$0.78 (-2.82%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets24.66B
FTVSX vs JVMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTVSX vs. JVMCX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTVSX is a Hold and JVMCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMCX has more cash in the bank: 24.7B vs. FTVSX (364M). FTVSX pays higher dividends than JVMCX: FTVSX (1.89) vs JVMCX (0.00). FTVSX was incepted earlier than JVMCX: FTVSX (8 years) vs JVMCX (14 years). JVMCX (1.86) is less costly to investors than FTVSX (1.03). JVMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. FTVSX (18.00). JVMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTVSX: JVMCX (1000) vs FTVSX (100000). JVMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.34 vs. FTVSX (-1.77). FTVSX return over 5 years is better than : 42.43 vs. JVMCX (15.97).
| FTVSX | JVMCX | FTVSX / JVMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 1.85 | 46% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 1.86 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.464 | 5.121 | 29% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 1000 | 10,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 364M | 24.7B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.89 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.77 | 3.34 | -53% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.47 | 6.94 | 223% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.43 | 15.97 | 266% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 61.82 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers