Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTVSX vs JVMCX
FTVSX vs JVMCX Comparison
Open Charts FTVSX vs JVMCX
FullerThaler Behav Md-Cp Val Instl
Price$34.21
Change-$0.28 (-0.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets407.25M
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap C
Price$27.41
Change-$0.21 (-0.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets23.59B
FTVSX vs JVMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTVSX vs. JVMCX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTVSX is a Buy and JVMCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMCX has more cash in the bank: 23.6B vs. FTVSX (407M). FTVSX pays higher dividends than JVMCX: FTVSX (1.41) vs JVMCX (0.00). FTVSX was incepted earlier than JVMCX: FTVSX (8 years) vs JVMCX (14 years). JVMCX (1.88) is less costly to investors than FTVSX (1.03). JVMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. FTVSX (33.00). JVMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTVSX: JVMCX (1000) vs FTVSX (100000). FTVSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.52 vs. JVMCX (-0.87). FTVSX return over 5 years is better than : 80.15 vs. JVMCX (43.38).
| FTVSX | JVMCX | FTVSX / JVMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 1.87 | 45% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 1.88 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.736 | 8.340 | 9% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 1000 | 10,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 407M | 23.6B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.41 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.52 | -0.87 | -291% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.36 | 8.57 | 144% |
| Returns for 5 years | 80.15 | 43.38 | 185% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 32.89 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers