Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTVSX vs JVMCX
FTVSX vs JVMCX Comparison
Open Charts FTVSX vs JVMCX
FullerThaler Behav Md-Cp Val Instl
Price$33.45
Change+$0.33 (+1.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets367.96M
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap C
Price$27.85
Change+$0.30 (+1.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets23.85B
FTVSX vs JVMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTVSX vs. JVMCX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTVSX is a Buy and JVMCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMCX has more cash in the bank: 23.9B vs. FTVSX (368M). FTVSX pays higher dividends than JVMCX: FTVSX (1.43) vs JVMCX (0.00). FTVSX was incepted earlier than JVMCX: FTVSX (8 years) vs JVMCX (14 years). JVMCX (1.86) is less costly to investors than FTVSX (1.03). JVMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. FTVSX (33.00). JVMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTVSX: JVMCX (1000) vs FTVSX (100000). FTVSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.25 vs. JVMCX (-6.45). FTVSX return over 5 years is better than : 72.33 vs. JVMCX (40.87).
| FTVSX | JVMCX | FTVSX / JVMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 1.85 | 46% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 1.86 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.473 | 8.893 | -28% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 1000 | 10,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 368M | 23.9B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.43 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.25 | -6.45 | 66% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.67 | 21.60 | 110% |
| Returns for 5 years | 72.33 | 40.87 | 177% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 38.46 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement