Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTTNX vs HBLRX
FTTNX vs HBLRX Comparison
Open Charts FTTNX vs HBLRX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 30% M
Price$12.74
Change-$0.08 (-0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.06B
Hartford Balanced Income R3
Price$15.16
Change-$0.07 (-0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.68B
FTTNX vs HBLRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTTNX vs. HBLRX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTTNX is a StrongBuy and HBLRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLRX has more cash in the bank: 11.7B vs. FTTNX (2.06B). HBLRX pays higher dividends than FTTNX: HBLRX (2.90) vs FTTNX (2.35). FTTNX was incepted earlier than HBLRX: FTTNX (18 years) vs HBLRX (15 years). HBLRX (1.28) is less costly to investors than FTTNX (1.04). HBLRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. FTTNX (19.00). FTTNX (0) and HBLRX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FTTNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.27 vs. HBLRX (3.26). FTTNX return over 5 years is better than : 16.67 vs. HBLRX (12.18).
| FTTNX | HBLRX | FTTNX / HBLRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 1.28 | 81% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 1.28 | 81% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.350 | 9.214 | 112% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.06B | 11.7B | 18% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.35 | 2.90 | 81% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.27 | 3.26 | 284% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.22 | 17.18 | 141% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.67 | 12.18 | 137% |
| Returns for 10 years | 42.69 | 42.50 | 100% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement