Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTTNX vs HBLRX
FTTNX vs HBLRX Comparison
Open Charts FTTNX vs HBLRX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 30% M
Price$12.91
Change+$0.01 (+0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.07B
Hartford Balanced Income R3
Price$14.83
Change+$0.01 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.68B
FTTNX vs HBLRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTTNX vs. HBLRX commentary
Dec 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTTNX is a StrongBuy and HBLRX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLRX has more cash in the bank: 11.7B vs. FTTNX (2.07B). HBLRX pays higher dividends than FTTNX: HBLRX (2.85) vs FTTNX (2.36). FTTNX was incepted earlier than HBLRX: FTTNX (18 years) vs HBLRX (16 years). HBLRX (1.28) is less costly to investors than FTTNX (1.05). HBLRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. FTTNX (19.00). FTTNX (0) and HBLRX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FTTNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.32 vs. HBLRX (5.98). FTTNX return over 5 years is better than : 14.37 vs. HBLRX (7.97).
| FTTNX | HBLRX | FTTNX / HBLRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 1.28 | 80% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 1.28 | 82% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.038 | 6.346 | 174% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.07B | 11.7B | 18% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.36 | 2.85 | 83% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.32 | 5.98 | 172% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.11 | 16.48 | 152% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.37 | 7.97 | 180% |
| Returns for 10 years | 45.60 | 40.60 | 112% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement