Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTTNX vs HBLIX
FTTNX vs HBLIX Comparison
Open Charts FTTNX vs HBLIX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 30% M
Price$12.74
Change-$0.08 (-0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.06B
Hartford Balanced Income I
Price$15.08
Change-$0.08 (-0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.68B
FTTNX vs HBLIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTTNX vs. HBLIX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTTNX is a StrongBuy and HBLIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLIX has more cash in the bank: 11.7B vs. FTTNX (2.06B). HBLIX pays higher dividends than FTTNX: HBLIX (3.51) vs FTTNX (2.35). FTTNX was incepted earlier than HBLIX: FTTNX (18 years) vs HBLIX (16 years). FTTNX (1.04) is less costly to investors than HBLIX (0.65). HBLIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. FTTNX (19.00). FTTNX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLIX: FTTNX (0) vs HBLIX (2000). FTTNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.45 vs. HBLIX (3.94). FTTNX return over 5 years is better than : 16.67 vs. HBLIX (15.56).
| FTTNX | HBLIX | FTTNX / HBLIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 0.65 | 160% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 0.65 | 160% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.350 | 9.852 | 105% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.06B | 11.7B | 18% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.35 | 3.51 | 67% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.45 | 3.94 | 240% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.67 | 19.42 | 127% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.67 | 15.56 | 107% |
| Returns for 10 years | 42.13 | 50.09 | 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement