Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTSDX vs PCAFX
FTSDX vs PCAFX Comparison
Open Charts FTSDX vs PCAFX
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Div & Inc M
Price$17.59
Change+$0.08 (+0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.21B
Prospector Capital Appreciation
Price$23.42
Change+$0.10 (+0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.87M
FTSDX vs PCAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTSDX vs. PCAFX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTSDX is a Buy and PCAFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTSDX has more cash in the bank: 5.21B vs. PCAFX (44.9M). FTSDX pays higher dividends than PCAFX: FTSDX (1.95) vs PCAFX (0.50). FTSDX was incepted earlier than PCAFX: FTSDX (22 years) vs PCAFX (18 years). PCAFX (1.56) is less costly to investors than FTSDX (1.17). FTSDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. PCAFX (30.00). FTSDX has a lower initial minimum investment than PCAFX: FTSDX (0) vs PCAFX (10000). FTSDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.67 vs. PCAFX (7.38). PCAFX return over 5 years is better than : 43.22 vs. FTSDX (34.81).
| FTSDX | PCAFX | FTSDX / PCAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 1.16 | 101% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 1.56 | 75% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.910 | 5.877 | 101% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 10000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.21B | 44.9M | 11,599% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.95 | 0.50 | 389% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.67 | 7.38 | 118% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.67 | 20.90 | 99% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.81 | 43.22 | 81% |
| Returns for 10 years | 42.89 | 54.00 | 79% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement