Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTSDX vs PCAFX
FTSDX vs PCAFX Comparison
Open Charts FTSDX vs PCAFX
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Div & Inc M
Price$17.12
Change-$0.14 (-0.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.13B
Prospector Capital Appreciation
Price$22.65
Change-$0.21 (-0.92%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets43.8M
FTSDX vs PCAFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTSDX vs. PCAFX commentary
Jun 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTSDX is a Buy and PCAFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTSDX has more cash in the bank: 5.13B vs. PCAFX (43.8M). FTSDX pays higher dividends than PCAFX: FTSDX (1.99) vs PCAFX (0.51). FTSDX was incepted earlier than PCAFX: FTSDX (21 years) vs PCAFX (18 years). PCAFX (1.56) is less costly to investors than FTSDX (1.17). FTSDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. PCAFX (30.00). FTSDX has a lower initial minimum investment than PCAFX: FTSDX (0) vs PCAFX (10000). FTSDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.42 vs. PCAFX (3.70). PCAFX return over 5 years is better than : 39.52 vs. FTSDX (34.61).
| FTSDX | PCAFX | FTSDX / PCAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 1.16 | 101% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 1.56 | 75% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.923 | 2.396 | 164% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 10000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.13B | 43.8M | 11,717% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.99 | 0.51 | 390% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.42 | 3.70 | 200% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.12 | 19.12 | 116% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.61 | 39.52 | 88% |
| Returns for 10 years | 38.06 | 47.28 | 81% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers