Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTSDX vs LMCMX
FTSDX vs LMCMX Comparison
Open Charts FTSDX vs LMCMX
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Div & Inc M
Price$18.52
Change+$0.09 (+0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.38B
Miller Income IS
Price$9.25
Change+$0.09 (+0.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets168.48M
FTSDX vs LMCMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTSDX vs. LMCMX commentary
Dec 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTSDX is a Hold and LMCMX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTSDX has more cash in the bank: 5.38B vs. LMCMX (168M). LMCMX pays higher dividends than FTSDX: LMCMX (4.96) vs FTSDX (1.95). FTSDX was incepted earlier than LMCMX: FTSDX (22 years) vs LMCMX (12 years). FTSDX (1.17) is less costly to investors than LMCMX (1.06). LMCMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 38.00 vs. FTSDX (36.00). FTSDX has a lower initial minimum investment than LMCMX: FTSDX (0) vs LMCMX (1000000). FTSDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.68 vs. LMCMX (5.29). LMCMX return over 5 years is better than : 60.68 vs. FTSDX (24.80).
| FTSDX | LMCMX | FTSDX / LMCMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 0.91 | 129% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 1.06 | 110% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.203 | 11.180 | 109% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.38B | 168M | 3,203% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.95 | 4.96 | 39% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.68 | 5.29 | 107% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.55 | 59.14 | 40% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.80 | 60.68 | 41% |
| Returns for 10 years | 59.95 | 130.62 | 46% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement