Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTSDX vs LMCLX
FTSDX vs LMCLX Comparison
Open Charts FTSDX vs LMCLX
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Div & Inc M
Price$17.12
Change-$0.14 (-0.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.13B
FTSDX vs LMCLX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTSDX vs. LMCLX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTSDX is a Buy and LMCLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTSDX has more cash in the bank: 5.13B vs. LMCLX (163M). LMCLX pays higher dividends than FTSDX: LMCLX (5.39) vs FTSDX (1.99). FTSDX was incepted earlier than LMCLX: FTSDX (21 years) vs LMCLX (11 years). FTSDX (1.17) and LMCLX (1.13) have similar cost to investors . LMCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. FTSDX (36.00). FTSDX has a lower initial minimum investment than LMCLX: FTSDX (0) vs LMCLX (1000000). LMCLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.15 vs. FTSDX (6.54). LMCLX return over 5 years is better than : 77.55 vs. FTSDX (33.52).
| FTSDX | LMCLX | FTSDX / LMCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 0.97 | 121% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 1.13 | 104% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.080 | -1.372 | -224% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.13B | 163M | 3,148% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.99 | 5.39 | 37% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.54 | 17.15 | 38% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.13 | 42.29 | 50% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.52 | 77.55 | 43% |
| Returns for 10 years | 36.94 | 57.43 | 64% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement