Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTSDX vs LMCKX
FTSDX vs LMCKX Comparison
Open Charts FTSDX vs LMCKX
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Div & Inc M
Price$17.12
Change-$0.14 (-0.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.13B
Miller Income FI
Price$8.47
Change-$0.11 (-1.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets163.3M
FTSDX vs LMCKX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTSDX vs. LMCKX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTSDX is a Buy and LMCKX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTSDX has more cash in the bank: 5.13B vs. LMCKX (163M). LMCKX pays higher dividends than FTSDX: LMCKX (4.80) vs FTSDX (1.99). FTSDX was incepted earlier than LMCKX: FTSDX (21 years) vs LMCKX (11 years). LMCKX (1.47) is less costly to investors than FTSDX (1.17). LMCKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. FTSDX (36.00). FTSDX (0) and LMCKX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. LMCKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.73 vs. FTSDX (6.54). LMCKX return over 5 years is better than : 74.79 vs. FTSDX (33.52).
| FTSDX | LMCKX | FTSDX / LMCKX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 1.32 | 89% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 1.47 | 80% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.080 | -1.566 | -197% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.13B | 163M | 3,148% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.99 | 4.80 | 42% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.54 | 16.73 | 39% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.13 | 41.08 | 51% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.52 | 74.79 | 45% |
| Returns for 10 years | 36.94 | 53.77 | 69% |