Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTSDX vs LMCJX
FTSDX vs LMCJX Comparison
Open Charts FTSDX vs LMCJX
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Div & Inc M
Price$17.12
Change-$0.14 (-0.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.13B
FTSDX vs LMCJX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTSDX vs. LMCJX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTSDX is a Buy and LMCJX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTSDX has more cash in the bank: 5.13B vs. LMCJX (163M). LMCJX pays higher dividends than FTSDX: LMCJX (4.91) vs FTSDX (1.99). FTSDX was incepted earlier than LMCJX: FTSDX (21 years) vs LMCJX (11 years). LMCJX (1.38) is less costly to investors than FTSDX (1.17). LMCJX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. FTSDX (36.00). LMCJX initial investment is less costly to investors than FTSDX (4%) vs FTSDX (4%). FTSDX has a lower initial minimum investment than LMCJX: FTSDX (0) vs LMCJX (1000). LMCJX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.87 vs. FTSDX (6.54). LMCJX return over 5 years is better than : 75.30 vs. FTSDX (33.52).
| FTSDX | LMCJX | FTSDX / LMCJX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 1.23 | 95% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 1.38 | 85% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.080 | -1.552 | -199% |
| Front Load | 4% | 6% | 61% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.13B | 163M | 3,148% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.99 | 4.91 | 41% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.54 | 16.87 | 39% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.13 | 41.20 | 51% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.52 | 75.30 | 45% |
| Returns for 10 years | 36.94 | 53.98 | 68% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement