Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTSDX vs LCMNX
FTSDX vs LCMNX Comparison
Open Charts FTSDX vs LCMNX
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Div & Inc M
Price$17.59
Change+$0.08 (+0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.21B
Miller Income C
Price$8.90
Change+$0.05 (+0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets171.55M
FTSDX vs LCMNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTSDX vs. LCMNX commentary
Jul 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTSDX is a Buy and LCMNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTSDX has more cash in the bank: 5.21B vs. LCMNX (172M). LCMNX pays higher dividends than FTSDX: LCMNX (3.59) vs FTSDX (1.95). FTSDX was incepted earlier than LCMNX: FTSDX (22 years) vs LCMNX (11 years). LCMNX (2.13) is less costly to investors than FTSDX (1.17). LCMNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. FTSDX (36.00). FTSDX has a lower initial minimum investment than LCMNX: FTSDX (0) vs LCMNX (1000). LCMNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.70 vs. FTSDX (8.67). LCMNX return over 5 years is better than : 82.42 vs. FTSDX (34.81).
| FTSDX | LCMNX | FTSDX / LCMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 1.98 | 59% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 2.13 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.910 | 4.067 | 145% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.21B | 172M | 3,028% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.95 | 3.59 | 54% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.67 | 20.70 | 42% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.67 | 52.37 | 39% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.81 | 82.42 | 42% |
| Returns for 10 years | 42.89 | 58.69 | 73% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers