Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTRNX vs RGAGX
FTRNX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts FTRNX vs RGAGX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R6
Price$81.49
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
FTRNX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTRNX vs. RGAGX commentary
Dec 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTRNX is a StrongBuy and RGAGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. FTRNX (4.57B). RGAGX pays higher dividends than FTRNX: RGAGX (0.57) vs FTRNX (0.50). FTRNX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: FTRNX (68 years) vs RGAGX (17 years). FTRNX (0.59) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.29). FTRNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. RGAGX (32.00). FTRNX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAGX: FTRNX (0) vs RGAGX (250). FTRNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.38 vs. RGAGX (6.11). FTRNX return over 5 years is better than : 36.03 vs. RGAGX (24.27).
| FTRNX | RGAGX | FTRNX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.29 | 203% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.29 | 203% |
| Fund Existence | 68 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.720 | 9.309 | 126% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.57B | 339B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.57 | 89% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.38 | 6.11 | 121% |
| Returns for 3 years | 89.74 | 68.25 | 131% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.03 | 24.27 | 148% |
| Returns for 10 years | 137.41 | 97.87 | 140% |