Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTRNX vs RGAGX
FTRNX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts FTRNX vs RGAGX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R6
Price$87.53
Change-$1.95 (-2.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.4B
FTRNX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTRNX vs. RGAGX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTRNX is a Hold and RGAGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. FTRNX (4.7B). RGAGX pays higher dividends than FTRNX: RGAGX (0.56) vs FTRNX (0.49). FTRNX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: FTRNX (67 years) vs RGAGX (17 years). FTRNX (0.59) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.30). FTRNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. RGAGX (25.00). FTRNX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAGX: FTRNX (0) vs RGAGX (250). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.29 vs. FTRNX (0.87). FTRNX return over 5 years is better than : 45.97 vs. RGAGX (41.96).
| FTRNX | RGAGX | FTRNX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.30 | 197% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.30 | 197% |
| Fund Existence | 67 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.637 | 20.027 | 83% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.7B | 340B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.49 | 0.56 | 88% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.87 | 9.29 | 9% |
| Returns for 3 years | 76.52 | 66.31 | 115% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.97 | 41.96 | 110% |
| Returns for 10 years | 146.97 | 105.33 | 140% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement