Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTRNX vs GFAFX
FTRNX vs GFAFX Comparison
Open Charts FTRNX vs GFAFX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$88.59
Change+$0.53 (+0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
FTRNX vs GFAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTRNX vs. GFAFX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTRNX is a StrongBuy and GFAFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. FTRNX (4.57B). FTRNX pays higher dividends than GFAFX: FTRNX (0.50) vs GFAFX (0.28). FTRNX was incepted earlier than GFAFX: FTRNX (68 years) vs GFAFX (25 years). GFAFX (0.67) is less costly to investors than FTRNX (0.59). FTRNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). FTRNX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFAFX: FTRNX (0) vs GFAFX (250). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.96 vs. FTRNX (-2.12). FTRNX return over 5 years is better than : 39.06 vs. GFAFX (31.86).
| FTRNX | GFAFX | FTRNX / GFAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.67 | 88% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.67 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 68 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.804 | 18.872 | 78% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.57B | 339B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.28 | 179% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.12 | 6.96 | -31% |
| Returns for 3 years | 71.39 | 61.66 | 116% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.06 | 31.86 | 123% |
| Returns for 10 years | 131.76 | 93.59 | 141% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement