Advertisement
FTQI vs RMBS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTQI is a Hold and RMBS is a StrongBuy.
RMBS | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 71 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 35 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 46 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 53 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 11 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| FTQI | RMBS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 70% | 3 days ago 68% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 61% | 3 days ago 71% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 76% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 66% | 3 days ago 81% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 69% | 3 days ago 75% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 76% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 5 days ago 75% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 70% | 3 days ago 65% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 72% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 75% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| FFGAX | 19.73 | 0.26 | +1.34% |
| Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stk A | |||
| CVAIX | 22.80 | -0.28 | -1.21% |
| Calamos Select Fund I | |||
| PRWAX | 75.38 | -1.06 | -1.39% |
| T. Rowe Price All-Cap Opportunities Fund | |||
| RDLAX | 10.67 | -0.17 | -1.57% |
| Columbia Disciplined Growth A | |||
| CMDYX | 13.17 | -0.59 | -4.27% |
| Columbia Mid Cap Index Inst3 | |||
FTQI and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FTQI has been closely correlated with RMBS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FTQI jumps, then RMBS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FTQI | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FTQI | 100% | -0.41% | ||
| RMBS - FTQI | 72% Closely correlated | -4.22% | ||
| HOOD - FTQI | 72% Closely correlated | -1.68% | ||
| FLEX - FTQI | 71% Closely correlated | -1.01% | ||
| ISRG - FTQI | 70% Closely correlated | -0.16% | ||
| ARM - FTQI | 70% Closely correlated | -2.21% | ||
More | ||||
RMBS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RMBS has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RMBS jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RMBS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RMBS | 100% | -4.22% | ||
| LRCX - RMBS | 79% Closely correlated | -2.33% | ||
| KLIC - RMBS | 78% Closely correlated | -2.36% | ||
| KLAC - RMBS | 76% Closely correlated | -0.84% | ||
| AMKR - RMBS | 76% Closely correlated | -2.45% | ||
| AMAT - RMBS | 76% Closely correlated | -2.52% | ||
More | ||||