Advertisement
FTQI vs RMBS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTQI is a Hold and RMBS is a Buy.
RMBS | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 73 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 30 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 46 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 40 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 10 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| FTQI | RMBS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 63% | 4 days ago 64% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 68% | 4 days ago 70% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 84% | 4 days ago 77% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 81% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 76% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 76% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 4 days ago 76% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 24 days ago 70% | 24 days ago 65% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 71% | 4 days ago 72% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 76% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| ADGGX | 24.35 | 0.29 | +1.21% |
| American Century Disciplined Growth R5 | |||
| SSAQX | 76.89 | 0.69 | +0.91% |
| State Street US Core Equity Fund | |||
| PXGOX | 17.93 | 0.12 | +0.67% |
| Impax Global Opportunities Institutional | |||
| JGRSX | 12.99 | 0.06 | +0.46% |
| JHancock Global Shareholder Yield R6 | |||
| NZDUSD | 0.61 | -0.00 | -0.15% |
| New Zealand Dollar - United States Dollar | |||
FTQI and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FTQI has been closely correlated with RMBS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FTQI jumps, then RMBS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FTQI | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FTQI | 100% | +0.26% | ||
| RMBS - FTQI | 72% Closely correlated | +1.37% | ||
| HOOD - FTQI | 71% Closely correlated | -3.65% | ||
| ARM - FTQI | 71% Closely correlated | +0.30% | ||
| FLEX - FTQI | 71% Closely correlated | +1.87% | ||
| AMKR - FTQI | 71% Closely correlated | -0.31% | ||
More | ||||
RMBS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RMBS has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RMBS jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RMBS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RMBS | 100% | +1.37% | ||
| LRCX - RMBS | 80% Closely correlated | -0.02% | ||
| KLIC - RMBS | 79% Closely correlated | -0.05% | ||
| AMKR - RMBS | 79% Closely correlated | -0.31% | ||
| QCOM - RMBS | 77% Closely correlated | -0.07% | ||
| KLAC - RMBS | 77% Closely correlated | +2.86% | ||
More | ||||