FTMDF
Price
$0.06
Change
-$0.01 (-14.29%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
15.88M
ORMNF
Price
$0.13
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
2.83M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FTMDF vs ORMNF

Header iconFTMDF vs ORMNF Comparison
Open Charts FTMDF vs ORMNFBanner chart's image
Fortune Minerals
Price$0.06
Change-$0.01 (-14.29%)
Volume$16.03K
Capitalization15.88M
Orex Minerals
Price$0.13
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$2K
Capitalization2.83M
FTMDF vs ORMNF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FTMDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ORMNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FTMDF vs. ORMNF commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTMDF is a Hold and ORMNF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (FTMDF: $0.06 vs. ORMNF: $0.13)
Brand notoriety: FTMDF and ORMNF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FTMDF: 22% vs. ORMNF: 10%
Market capitalization -- FTMDF: $15.88M vs. ORMNF: $2.83M
FTMDF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $15.88M. ORMNF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $2.83M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.14B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FTMDF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileORMNF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FTMDF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • ORMNF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both FTMDF and ORMNF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FTMDF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ORMNF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FTMDF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • ORMNF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both FTMDF and ORMNF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

FTMDF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -10.56% price change this week, while ORMNF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +2.11% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +2.18%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +15.03%, and the average quarterly price growth was +34.74%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+2.18% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTMDF($15.9M) has a higher market cap than ORMNF($2.83M). FTMDF YTD gains are higher at: 75.214 vs. ORMNF (39.196). ORMNF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.83M vs. FTMDF (-31.73M). ORMNF has more cash in the bank: 1.59M vs. FTMDF (137K). ORMNF has less debt than FTMDF: ORMNF (722K) vs FTMDF (8.61M). FTMDF (0) and ORMNF (0) have equivalent revenues.
FTMDFORMNFFTMDF / ORMNF
Capitalization15.9M2.83M562%
EBITDA-31.73M-1.83M1,733%
Gain YTD75.21439.196192%
P/E Ratio256.41N/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash137K1.59M9%
Total Debt8.61M722K1,193%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FTMDF vs ORMNF: Fundamental Ratings
FTMDF
ORMNF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9150
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
93
Overvalued
59
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
89100
SMR RATING
1..100
9498
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3941
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5491
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ORMNF's Valuation (59) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FTMDF (93). This means that ORMNF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FTMDF’s over the last 12 months.

FTMDF's Profit vs Risk Rating (89) in the null industry is in the same range as ORMNF (100). This means that FTMDF’s stock grew similarly to ORMNF’s over the last 12 months.

FTMDF's SMR Rating (94) in the null industry is in the same range as ORMNF (98). This means that FTMDF’s stock grew similarly to ORMNF’s over the last 12 months.

FTMDF's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as ORMNF (41). This means that FTMDF’s stock grew similarly to ORMNF’s over the last 12 months.

FTMDF's P/E Growth Rating (54) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ORMNF (91). This means that FTMDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ORMNF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FTMDFORMNF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
90%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FTMDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ORMNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MEI6.610.10
+1.54%
Methode Electronics
SYRE17.790.19
+1.08%
Spyre Therapeutics
IDA123.250.48
+0.39%
IDACORP
CPNG30.250.11
+0.36%
Coupang
INDO2.77-0.02
-0.72%
Indonesia Energy Corp

FTMDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FTMDF and CASXF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FTMDF and CASXF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FTMDF
1D Price
Change %
FTMDF100%
-12.14%
CASXF - FTMDF
23%
Poorly correlated
-24.16%
KCCFF - FTMDF
20%
Poorly correlated
+5.02%
ORMNF - FTMDF
20%
Poorly correlated
-3.08%
FRACF - FTMDF
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GARWF - FTMDF
10%
Poorly correlated
+5.76%
More

ORMNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ORMNF has been loosely correlated with CTJHY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ORMNF jumps, then CTJHY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ORMNF
1D Price
Change %
ORMNF100%
-3.08%
CTJHY - ORMNF
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
AXVEF - ORMNF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MTLFF - ORMNF
23%
Poorly correlated
+18.76%
ISOU - ORMNF
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.71%
FTMDF - ORMNF
20%
Poorly correlated
-12.14%
More