Advertisement
FTLS vs SEIC
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTLS is a Hold and SEIC is a Buy.
SEIC | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 10 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 88 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 25 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 32 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 54 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 59 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| FTLS | SEIC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 3 days ago 62% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 51% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 48% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 51% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 46% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 82% | 5 days ago 50% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 3 days ago 52% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 3 days ago 38% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 53% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| GDXU | 178.84 | 5.98 | +3.46% |
| MicroSectors™ Gold Miners 3X Lvrgd ETN | |||
| JETU | 23.11 | N/A | N/A |
| MAX Airlines 3X Leveraged ETN | |||
| PEPS | 28.32 | N/A | N/A |
| Parametric Equity Plus ETF | |||
| DOCT | 42.98 | -0.07 | -0.17% |
| FT Vest US Equity Deep Bffr ETF Oct | |||
| FXA | 64.72 | -0.45 | -0.69% |
| Invesco CcyShrs® Australian Dllr Trust | |||
FTLS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FTLS has been closely correlated with SEIC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FTLS jumps, then SEIC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FTLS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FTLS | 100% | -0.08% | ||
| SEIC - FTLS | 73% Closely correlated | -1.01% | ||
| GS - FTLS | 73% Closely correlated | +0.29% | ||
| MS - FTLS | 72% Closely correlated | +0.68% | ||
| JHG - FTLS | 72% Closely correlated | +0.23% | ||
| SF - FTLS | 70% Closely correlated | -0.36% | ||
More | ||||
SEIC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SEIC has been closely correlated with TROW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SEIC jumps, then TROW could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SEIC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEIC | 100% | -1.01% | ||
| TROW - SEIC | 77% Closely correlated | -0.25% | ||
| BN - SEIC | 77% Closely correlated | -1.79% | ||
| JHG - SEIC | 77% Closely correlated | +0.25% | ||
| KKR - SEIC | 73% Closely correlated | -1.65% | ||
| CG - SEIC | 73% Closely correlated | -0.58% | ||
More | ||||