It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FTLF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while.
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FTLF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
FTLF (@Food: Major Diversified) experienced а -1.60% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Major Diversified industry was +0.85%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.05%.
Companies in this industry usually make a diverse range of agricultural and/or processed food. Some prominent names in this segment are Mondelez International, which makes chocolates, biscuits, cookies etc. The Kraft Heinz Company specializes in ketchups, sauces, fruit drink pouches and many more. General Mills, Inc. sells flour and cereal. Kellogg is famous for its snacks and breakfast cereal. And so on down the line. As more and more consumers are looking for healthier options in food in recent years, several legacy food companies have responded by revamping brands to include organic and no-added-sugar versions, and/or acquiring healthy food firms, and even streamlining operations.
FTLF | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 63 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 78 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 17 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 42 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 47 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 32 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| FTLF | RCG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 69% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 3 days ago 88% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 3 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 70% | 3 days ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 73% | 3 days ago 89% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 71% | 3 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 63% | 11 days ago 85% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 73% | 3 days ago 86% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 64% | N/A |
A.I.dvisor tells us that FTLF and FARM have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FTLF and FARM's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FTLF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FTLF | 100% | -2.74% | ||
| FARM - FTLF | 24% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| MKC - FTLF | 21% Poorly correlated | +0.33% | ||
| FRPT - FTLF | 20% Poorly correlated | -3.90% | ||
| DAR - FTLF | 20% Poorly correlated | +0.26% | ||
| BYND - FTLF | 18% Poorly correlated | -9.42% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor tells us that RCG and MSB have been poorly correlated (+12% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RCG and MSB's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RCG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RCG | 100% | +0.47% | ||
| MSB - RCG | 12% Poorly correlated | +0.81% | ||
| CACI - RCG | 11% Poorly correlated | -0.21% | ||
| APYX - RCG | 6% Poorly correlated | +8.25% | ||
| FTLF - RCG | 4% Poorly correlated | -1.09% | ||
| TPL - RCG | 3% Poorly correlated | +1.74% | ||
More | ||||