Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTIWX vs RBBCX
FTIWX vs RBBCX Comparison
Open Charts FTIWX vs RBBCX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 20% I
Price$14.29
Change+$0.01 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.56B
Columbia Income Builder C
Price$12.28
Change-$0.02 (-0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets850.6M
FTIWX vs RBBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTIWX vs. RBBCX commentary
Sep 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTIWX is a Buy and RBBCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTIWX has more cash in the bank: 5.56B vs. RBBCX (851M). FTIWX (3.12) and RBBCX (2.99) have matching dividends . FTIWX was incepted earlier than RBBCX: FTIWX (19 years) vs RBBCX (20 years). RBBCX (1.72) is less costly to investors than FTIWX (0.52). FTIWX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. RBBCX (18.00). FTIWX has a lower initial minimum investment than RBBCX: FTIWX (0) vs RBBCX (2000). RBBCX IRA initial investment is lower compared to FTIWX: RBBCX (1000) vs FTIWX (500). FTIWX (5.63) and RBBCX (5.58) have marching annual gain over last year. FTIWX return over 5 years is better than : 15.72 vs. RBBCX (14.82).
| FTIWX | RBBCX | FTIWX / RBBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.52 | 1.72 | 30% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.52 | 1.72 | 30% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.335 | 8.307 | 88% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | 1000 | 50% |
| Net Assets | 5.56B | 851M | 653% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.12 | 2.99 | 104% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.63 | 5.58 | 101% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.06 | 27.49 | 84% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.72 | 14.82 | 106% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.38 | 44.80 | 79% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement