Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTISX vs LINPX
FTISX vs LINPX Comparison
Open Charts FTISX vs LINPX
Fidelity Advisor Intl Small Cap M
Price$36.13
Change+$0.22 (+0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.24B
Lord Abbett International Opp P
Price$22.81
Change+$0.12 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets321.8M
FTISX vs LINPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTISX vs. LINPX commentary
Sep 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTISX is a Hold and LINPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTISX has more cash in the bank: 5.24B vs. LINPX (322M). FTISX pays higher dividends than LINPX: FTISX (1.86) vs LINPX (1.33). FTISX was incepted earlier than LINPX: FTISX (22 years) vs LINPX (27 years). FTISX (1.54) is less costly to investors than LINPX (1.45). LINPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. FTISX (17.00). FTISX (0) and LINPX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FTISX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.72 vs. LINPX (9.05). FTISX return over 5 years is better than : 54.41 vs. LINPX (46.06).
| FTISX | LINPX | FTISX / LINPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.54 | 1.45 | 106% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.54 | 1.45 | 106% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.503 | 23.297 | 88% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.24B | 322M | 1,627% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.86 | 1.33 | 140% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.72 | 9.05 | 107% |
| Returns for 3 years | 67.02 | 64.21 | 104% |
| Returns for 5 years | 54.41 | 46.06 | 118% |
| Returns for 10 years | 76.37 | 50.22 | 152% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement