Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHMX vs VIMSX
FTHMX vs VIMSX Comparison
Open Charts FTHMX vs VIMSX
FullerThaler Behav Md-Cp Eq Inst
Price$27.22
Change+$0.29 (+1.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.83M
Vanguard Mid Cap Index Investor
Price$79.10
Change+$0.60 (+0.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets192.45B
FTHMX vs VIMSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VIMSX has more cash in the bank: 192B vs. FTHMX (110M). VIMSX pays higher dividends than FTHMX: VIMSX (1.40) vs FTHMX (0.27). FTHMX was incepted earlier than VIMSX: FTHMX (2 years) vs VIMSX (27 years). FTHMX (1.49) is less costly to investors than VIMSX (0.17). VIMSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 16.00 vs. FTHMX (13.00). VIMSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHMX: VIMSX (3000) vs FTHMX (100000). VIMSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.91 vs. FTHMX (13.40).
| FTHMX | VIMSX | FTHMX / VIMSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 0.17 | 488% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 0.17 | 876% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.924 | 9.818 | 91% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 3000 | 3,333% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 110M | 192B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.27 | 1.40 | 19% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.40 | 17.91 | 75% |
| Returns for 3 years | N/A | 42.07 | - |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 70.78 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 132.48 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement