Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs ZSCCX
FTHFX vs ZSCCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs ZSCCX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$47.67
Change+$0.81 (+1.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.78B
FTHFX vs ZSCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. ZSCCX commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and ZSCCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10.8B vs. ZSCCX (28.4M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than ZSCCX: FTHFX (0.76) vs ZSCCX (0.00). FTHFX was incepted earlier than ZSCCX: FTHFX (14 years) vs ZSCCX (14 years). ZSCCX (1.71) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). ZSCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 135.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). ZSCCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: ZSCCX (2500) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.03 vs. ZSCCX (-16.64). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 99.73 vs. ZSCCX (47.80).
| FTHFX | ZSCCX | FTHFX / ZSCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.39 | 45% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.71 | 37% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.954 | 0.653 | 758% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.8B | 28.4M | 38,028% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.76 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.03 | -16.64 | -12% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.52 | 3.93 | 1,159% |
| Returns for 5 years | 99.73 | 47.80 | 209% |
| Returns for 10 years | 152.73 | 27.43 | 557% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement