Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs ZSCCX
FTHFX vs ZSCCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs ZSCCX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$48.37
Change-$0.38 (-0.78%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.99B
FTHFX vs ZSCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. ZSCCX commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and ZSCCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11B vs. ZSCCX (28.8M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than ZSCCX: FTHFX (0.74) vs ZSCCX (0.00). FTHFX was incepted earlier than ZSCCX: FTHFX (14 years) vs ZSCCX (14 years). ZSCCX (1.71) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). ZSCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 135.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). ZSCCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: ZSCCX (2500) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.59 vs. ZSCCX (-11.69). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 89.14 vs. ZSCCX (41.47).
| FTHFX | ZSCCX | FTHFX / ZSCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.39 | 45% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.71 | 37% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.495 | 3.331 | 195% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11B | 28.8M | 38,194% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.74 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.59 | -11.69 | -39% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.22 | -1.72 | -2,166% |
| Returns for 5 years | 89.14 | 41.47 | 215% |
| Returns for 10 years | 154.43 | 30.50 | 506% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement