Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs ZSCCX
FTHFX vs ZSCCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs ZSCCX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$49.02
Change-$0.94 (-1.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.11B
FTHFX vs ZSCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. ZSCCX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a StrongBuy and ZSCCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. ZSCCX (29.9M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than ZSCCX: FTHFX (0.70) vs ZSCCX (0.00). FTHFX was incepted earlier than ZSCCX: FTHFX (14 years) vs ZSCCX (14 years). ZSCCX (1.71) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). ZSCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 135.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). ZSCCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: ZSCCX (2500) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -6.29 vs. ZSCCX (-14.18). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 83.31 vs. ZSCCX (40.53).
| FTHFX | ZSCCX | FTHFX / ZSCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.39 | 45% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.71 | 37% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.926 | 8.720 | 91% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.1B | 29.9M | 37,124% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.70 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.29 | -14.18 | 44% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.76 | 6.91 | 575% |
| Returns for 5 years | 83.31 | 40.53 | 206% |
| Returns for 10 years | 165.67 | 42.93 | 386% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement