Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs WWSYX
FTHFX vs WWSYX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs WWSYX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$53.15
Change+$3.45 (+6.94%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.13B
Westwood Quality SmallCap Fund Ultra
Price$20.42
Change+$0.04 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets974.34M
FTHFX vs WWSYX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. WWSYX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and WWSYX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. WWSYX (974M). WWSYX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: WWSYX (0.84) vs FTHFX (0.63). FTHFX was incepted earlier than WWSYX: FTHFX (14 years) vs WWSYX (6 years). WWSYX (0.93) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). WWSYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 63.00 vs. FTHFX (28.00). FTHFX (1000000) and WWSYX (1000000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.23 vs. WWSYX (0.37). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 72.22 vs. WWSYX (14.55).
| FTHFX | WWSYX | FTHFX / WWSYX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.79 | 80% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.93 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.019 | 6.911 | 73% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.1B | 974M | 1,140% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.63 | 0.84 | 75% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.23 | 0.37 | 4,329% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.94 | 5.18 | 791% |
| Returns for 5 years | 72.22 | 14.55 | 496% |
| Returns for 10 years | 279.59 | N/A | - |