Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs WWSMX
FTHFX vs WWSMX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs WWSMX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$51.64
Change-$0.19 (-0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.13B
Westwood Quality SMidCap Fund Ultra
Price$16.71
Change+$0.02 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets100.4M
FTHFX vs WWSMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. WWSMX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and WWSMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. WWSMX (100M). WWSMX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: WWSMX (1.43) vs FTHFX (0.69). FTHFX was incepted earlier than WWSMX: FTHFX (14 years) vs WWSMX (5 years). WWSMX (0.87) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). WWSMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 73.00 vs. FTHFX (28.00). FTHFX (1000000) and WWSMX (1000000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.63 vs. WWSMX (4.54). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 75.57 vs. WWSMX (27.98).
| FTHFX | WWSMX | FTHFX / WWSMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.70 | 90% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.87 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.694 | 5.693 | 241% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.1B | 100M | 11,100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.69 | 1.43 | 48% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.63 | 4.54 | 256% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.29 | 35.06 | 143% |
| Returns for 5 years | 75.57 | 27.98 | 270% |
| Returns for 10 years | 225.13 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement