Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs WWSMX
FTHFX vs WWSMX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs WWSMX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$50.11
Change+$0.54 (+1.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.13B
Westwood Quality SMidCap Fund Ultra
Price$17.12
Change+$0.18 (+1.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets99.34M
FTHFX vs WWSMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. WWSMX (99.3M). WWSMX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: WWSMX (1.43) vs FTHFX (0.70). FTHFX was incepted earlier than WWSMX: FTHFX (14 years) vs WWSMX (5 years). WWSMX (0.87) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). WWSMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 73.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). FTHFX (1000000) and WWSMX (1000000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. WWSMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.37 vs. FTHFX (2.48). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 114.02 vs. WWSMX (59.68).
| FTHFX | WWSMX | FTHFX / WWSMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.70 | 90% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.87 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.326 | 8.286 | 125% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.1B | 99.3M | 11,178% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.70 | 1.43 | 49% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.48 | 7.37 | 34% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.88 | 53.19 | 120% |
| Returns for 5 years | 114.02 | 59.68 | 191% |
| Returns for 10 years | 189.61 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers