Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs WWSMX
FTHFX vs WWSMX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs WWSMX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$43.73
Change-$0.69 (-1.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.91B
Westwood Quality SMidCap Fund Ultra
Price$15.60
Change-$0.22 (-1.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets92.05M
FTHFX vs WWSMX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 9.91B vs. WWSMX (92M). WWSMX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: WWSMX (1.60) vs FTHFX (0.79). FTHFX was incepted earlier than WWSMX: FTHFX (14 years) vs WWSMX (5 years). WWSMX (0.87) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). WWSMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 73.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). FTHFX (1000000) and WWSMX (1000000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. WWSMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.88 vs. FTHFX (-1.78).
| FTHFX | WWSMX | FTHFX / WWSMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.70 | 90% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.87 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.721 | -1.328 | 280% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.91B | 92M | 10,772% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.79 | 1.60 | 49% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.78 | 5.88 | -30% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.46 | 32.82 | 120% |
| Returns for 5 years | 93.55 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | 132.30 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers