Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs WWSMX
FTHFX vs WWSMX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs WWSMX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$46.91
Change+$0.37 (+0.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.66B
Westwood Quality SMidCap Fund Ultra
Price$16.49
Change+$0.09 (+0.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets97.27M
FTHFX vs WWSMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10.7B vs. WWSMX (97.3M). WWSMX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: WWSMX (1.52) vs FTHFX (0.76). FTHFX was incepted earlier than WWSMX: FTHFX (14 years) vs WWSMX (5 years). WWSMX (0.87) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). WWSMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 73.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). FTHFX (1000000) and WWSMX (1000000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. WWSMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.15 vs. FTHFX (5.98).
| FTHFX | WWSMX | FTHFX / WWSMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.70 | 90% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.87 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.280 | 4.301 | 76% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.7B | 97.3M | 10,997% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.76 | 1.52 | 50% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.98 | 12.15 | 49% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.75 | 40.63 | 122% |
| Returns for 5 years | 102.86 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | 151.69 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers