Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs WWSCX
FTHFX vs WWSCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs WWSCX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$51.83
Change-$0.06 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.13B
Keeley Small Cap Fund C
Price$18.79
Change+$0.06 (+0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets73.58M
FTHFX vs WWSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. WWSCX commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and WWSCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. WWSCX (73.6M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than WWSCX: FTHFX (0.69) vs WWSCX (0.00). FTHFX was incepted earlier than WWSCX: FTHFX (14 years) vs WWSCX (24 years). WWSCX (2.33) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). WWSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 47.00 vs. FTHFX (28.00). WWSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: WWSCX (1000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.53 vs. WWSCX (10.14). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 76.22 vs. WWSCX (14.27).
| FTHFX | WWSCX | FTHFX / WWSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 2.00 | 32% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 2.33 | 27% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.113 | 10.986 | 128% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.1B | 73.6M | 15,082% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.69 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.53 | 10.14 | 124% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.85 | 11.43 | 445% |
| Returns for 5 years | 76.22 | 14.27 | 534% |
| Returns for 10 years | 227.11 | 32.59 | 697% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement