Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs WWSCX
FTHFX vs WWSCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs WWSCX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$47.67
Change+$0.81 (+1.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.78B
Keeley Small Cap Fund C
Price$16.79
Change+$0.05 (+0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets66.69M
FTHFX vs WWSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. WWSCX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and WWSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10.8B vs. WWSCX (66.7M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than WWSCX: FTHFX (0.76) vs WWSCX (0.05). FTHFX was incepted earlier than WWSCX: FTHFX (14 years) vs WWSCX (24 years). WWSCX (2.33) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. WWSCX (21.00). WWSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: WWSCX (1000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.03 vs. WWSCX (-17.82). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 99.73 vs. WWSCX (37.64).
| FTHFX | WWSCX | FTHFX / WWSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 2.00 | 32% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 2.33 | 27% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.954 | -0.827 | -599% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.8B | 66.7M | 16,192% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.76 | 0.05 | 1,440% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.03 | -17.82 | -11% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.52 | -3.45 | -1,319% |
| Returns for 5 years | 99.73 | 37.64 | 265% |
| Returns for 10 years | 152.73 | -3.84 | -3,979% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers