Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs WWSAX
FTHFX vs WWSAX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs WWSAX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$53.15
Change+$3.45 (+6.94%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.13B
Keeley Small Cap Fund A
Price$25.18
Change+$2.93 (+13.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets79.22M
FTHFX vs WWSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. WWSAX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and WWSAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. WWSAX (79.2M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than WWSAX: FTHFX (0.63) vs WWSAX (0.57). FTHFX was incepted earlier than WWSAX: FTHFX (14 years) vs WWSAX (24 years). WWSAX (1.58) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). WWSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 47.00 vs. FTHFX (28.00). WWSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: WWSAX (1000) vs FTHFX (1000000). WWSAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.06 vs. FTHFX (16.23). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 72.22 vs. WWSAX (19.53).
| FTHFX | WWSAX | FTHFX / WWSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.25 | 50% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.58 | 40% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.019 | 10.779 | 47% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.1B | 79.2M | 14,015% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.63 | 0.57 | 111% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.23 | 21.06 | 77% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.94 | 9.81 | 417% |
| Returns for 5 years | 72.22 | 19.53 | 370% |
| Returns for 10 years | 279.59 | 87.13 | 321% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement