Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs WWSAX
FTHFX vs WWSAX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs WWSAX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$49.89
Change+$0.42 (+0.85%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.08B
Keeley Small Cap Fund A
Price$22.64
Change+$0.41 (+1.84%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets69.12M
FTHFX vs WWSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. WWSAX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and WWSAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. WWSAX (69.1M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than WWSAX: FTHFX (0.69) vs WWSAX (0.66). FTHFX was incepted earlier than WWSAX: FTHFX (14 years) vs WWSAX (24 years). WWSAX (1.58) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. WWSAX (21.00). WWSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: WWSAX (1000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.91 vs. WWSAX (-13.70). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 94.83 vs. WWSAX (42.18).
| FTHFX | WWSAX | FTHFX / WWSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.25 | 50% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.58 | 40% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.917 | 6.262 | 142% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.1B | 69.1M | 16,064% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.69 | 0.66 | 106% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.91 | -13.70 | 14% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.30 | 9.42 | 534% |
| Returns for 5 years | 94.83 | 42.18 | 225% |
| Returns for 10 years | 169.48 | 19.93 | 850% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement