Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs WWSAX
FTHFX vs WWSAX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs WWSAX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$50.11
Change+$0.54 (+1.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.26B
Keeley Small Cap Fund A
Price$22.65
Change+$0.24 (+1.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets70.75M
FTHFX vs WWSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. WWSAX commentary
Sep 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and WWSAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.3B vs. WWSAX (70.7M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than WWSAX: FTHFX (0.70) vs WWSAX (0.67). FTHFX was incepted earlier than WWSAX: FTHFX (14 years) vs WWSAX (24 years). WWSAX (1.58) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. WWSAX (21.00). WWSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: WWSAX (1000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.48 vs. WWSAX (-9.19). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 114.02 vs. WWSAX (63.76).
| FTHFX | WWSAX | FTHFX / WWSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.25 | 50% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.58 | 40% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.326 | 8.270 | 125% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.3B | 70.7M | 15,983% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.70 | 0.67 | 105% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.48 | -9.19 | -27% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.88 | 18.70 | 342% |
| Returns for 5 years | 114.02 | 63.76 | 179% |
| Returns for 10 years | 189.61 | 29.59 | 641% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement