Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs WWSAX
FTHFX vs WWSAX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs WWSAX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$48.37
Change-$0.38 (-0.78%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.99B
Keeley Small Cap Fund A
Price$21.27
Change-$0.19 (-0.89%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets67.41M
FTHFX vs WWSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. WWSAX commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and WWSAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11B vs. WWSAX (67.4M). FTHFX (0.74) and WWSAX (0.71) have matching dividends . FTHFX was incepted earlier than WWSAX: FTHFX (14 years) vs WWSAX (24 years). WWSAX (1.58) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. WWSAX (21.00). WWSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: WWSAX (1000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.59 vs. WWSAX (-13.70). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 89.14 vs. WWSAX (38.38).
| FTHFX | WWSAX | FTHFX / WWSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.25 | 50% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.58 | 40% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.495 | 1.673 | 388% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11B | 67.4M | 16,320% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.74 | 0.71 | 104% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.59 | -13.70 | -34% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.22 | -6.42 | -579% |
| Returns for 5 years | 89.14 | 38.38 | 232% |
| Returns for 10 years | 154.43 | 11.34 | 1,361% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement