Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs WWSAX
FTHFX vs WWSAX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs WWSAX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$51.83
Change-$0.06 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.13B
Keeley Small Cap Fund A
Price$23.24
Change+$0.08 (+0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets73.58M
FTHFX vs WWSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. WWSAX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and WWSAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. WWSAX (73.6M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than WWSAX: FTHFX (0.69) vs WWSAX (0.62). FTHFX was incepted earlier than WWSAX: FTHFX (14 years) vs WWSAX (24 years). WWSAX (1.58) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). WWSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 47.00 vs. FTHFX (28.00). WWSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: WWSAX (1000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.53 vs. WWSAX (10.25). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 76.22 vs. WWSAX (19.14).
| FTHFX | WWSAX | FTHFX / WWSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.25 | 50% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.58 | 40% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.113 | 11.090 | 127% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.1B | 73.6M | 15,082% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.69 | 0.62 | 110% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.53 | 10.25 | 122% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.85 | 13.00 | 391% |
| Returns for 5 years | 76.22 | 19.14 | 398% |
| Returns for 10 years | 227.11 | 50.02 | 454% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement