Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs WSCOX
FTHFX vs WSCOX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs WSCOX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$49.47
Change+$0.27 (+0.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.02B
Allspring Disciplined Small Cap Inst
Price$15.35
Change-$0.11 (-0.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets106.33M
FTHFX vs WSCOX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. WSCOX commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and WSCOX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11B vs. WSCOX (106M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than WSCOX: FTHFX (0.69) vs WSCOX (0.32). FTHFX was incepted earlier than WSCOX: FTHFX (14 years) vs WSCOX (11 years). WSCOX (0.96) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). WSCOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). FTHFX (1000000) and WSCOX (1000000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. WSCOX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.82 vs. FTHFX (-1.91). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 94.83 vs. WSCOX (78.48).
| FTHFX | WSCOX | FTHFX / WSCOX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.60 | 105% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.96 | 66% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.917 | 17.086 | 52% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11B | 106M | 10,377% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.69 | 0.32 | 219% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.91 | 8.82 | -22% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.30 | 49.57 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 94.83 | 78.48 | 121% |
| Returns for 10 years | 169.48 | -33.70 | -503% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement