Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs WMMCX
FTHFX vs WMMCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs WMMCX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$46.91
Change+$0.37 (+0.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.66B
TETON Westwood Mighty Mites C
Price$12.64
Change+$0.15 (+1.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets207.11M
FTHFX vs WMMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. WMMCX commentary
Jul 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and WMMCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10.7B vs. WMMCX (207M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than WMMCX: FTHFX (0.76) vs WMMCX (0.00). FTHFX was incepted earlier than WMMCX: FTHFX (14 years) vs WMMCX (24 years). WMMCX (2.25) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. WMMCX (2.00). WMMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: WMMCX (1000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.98 vs. WMMCX (-9.33). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 102.86 vs. WMMCX (-26.90).
| FTHFX | WMMCX | FTHFX / WMMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 2.25 | 28% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 2.25 | 28% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.280 | 6.577 | 50% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.7B | 207M | 5,169% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.76 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.98 | -9.33 | -64% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.75 | -24.38 | -204% |
| Returns for 5 years | 102.86 | -26.90 | -382% |
| Returns for 10 years | 151.69 | -40.74 | -372% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement