Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs WMMCX
FTHFX vs WMMCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs WMMCX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$52.07
Change+$0.57 (+1.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.13B
TETON Westwood Mighty Mites C
Price$10.93
Change+$0.16 (+1.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets187.72M
FTHFX vs WMMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. WMMCX commentary
Dec 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and WMMCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. WMMCX (188M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than WMMCX: FTHFX (0.69) vs WMMCX (0.00). FTHFX was incepted earlier than WMMCX: FTHFX (14 years) vs WMMCX (24 years). WMMCX (2.25) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. WMMCX (2.00). WMMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: WMMCX (1000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.21 vs. WMMCX (-13.53). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 81.55 vs. WMMCX (-45.71).
| FTHFX | WMMCX | FTHFX / WMMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 2.25 | 28% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 2.25 | 28% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.641 | -7.841 | -187% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.1B | 188M | 5,904% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.69 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.21 | -13.53 | -53% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.92 | -31.24 | -153% |
| Returns for 5 years | 81.55 | -45.71 | -178% |
| Returns for 10 years | 196.61 | -42.76 | -460% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers