Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs WMCVX
FTHFX vs WMCVX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs WMCVX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$46.91
Change+$0.37 (+0.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.66B
FTHFX vs WMCVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. WMCVX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and WMCVX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10.7B vs. WMCVX (1.6B). FTHFX pays higher dividends than WMCVX: FTHFX (0.76) vs WMCVX (0.06). FTHFX was incepted earlier than WMCVX: FTHFX (14 years) vs WMCVX (28 years). WMCVX (1.18) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). WMCVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). WMCVX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: WMCVX (2000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.98 vs. WMCVX (-9.33). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 102.86 vs. WMCVX (46.24).
| FTHFX | WMCVX | FTHFX / WMCVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.18 | 53% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.18 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.280 | -1.114 | -294% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2000 | 50,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.7B | 1.6B | 668% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.76 | 0.06 | 1,217% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.98 | -9.33 | -64% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.75 | 21.76 | 229% |
| Returns for 5 years | 102.86 | 46.24 | 222% |
| Returns for 10 years | 151.69 | 50.51 | 300% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers