Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs WMCVX
FTHFX vs WMCVX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs WMCVX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$53.15
Change+$3.45 (+6.94%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.13B
FTHFX vs WMCVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. WMCVX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and WMCVX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. WMCVX (1.43B). FTHFX pays higher dividends than WMCVX: FTHFX (0.63) vs WMCVX (0.00). FTHFX was incepted earlier than WMCVX: FTHFX (14 years) vs WMCVX (28 years). WMCVX (1.18) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). WMCVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 65.00 vs. FTHFX (28.00). WMCVX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: WMCVX (2000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.23 vs. WMCVX (-3.89). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 72.22 vs. WMCVX (-3.51).
| FTHFX | WMCVX | FTHFX / WMCVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.18 | 53% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.18 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.019 | 7.589 | 66% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2000 | 50,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.1B | 1.43B | 775% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.63 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.23 | -3.89 | -418% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.94 | 2.61 | 1,568% |
| Returns for 5 years | 72.22 | -3.51 | -2,057% |
| Returns for 10 years | 279.59 | 85.61 | 327% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement