Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs WMCVX
FTHFX vs WMCVX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs WMCVX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$49.02
Change-$0.94 (-1.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.11B
FTHFX vs WMCVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. WMCVX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a StrongBuy and WMCVX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. WMCVX (1.45B). FTHFX pays higher dividends than WMCVX: FTHFX (0.70) vs WMCVX (0.06). FTHFX was incepted earlier than WMCVX: FTHFX (14 years) vs WMCVX (28 years). WMCVX (1.18) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). WMCVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). WMCVX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: WMCVX (2000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -6.29 vs. WMCVX (-24.76). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 83.31 vs. WMCVX (15.53).
| FTHFX | WMCVX | FTHFX / WMCVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.18 | 53% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.18 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.926 | -4.458 | -178% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2000 | 50,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.1B | 1.45B | 768% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.70 | 0.06 | 1,139% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.29 | -24.76 | 25% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.76 | 4.95 | 803% |
| Returns for 5 years | 83.31 | 15.53 | 536% |
| Returns for 10 years | 165.67 | 62.04 | 267% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers