Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs WHGSX
FTHFX vs WHGSX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs WHGSX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$53.15
Change+$3.45 (+6.94%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.13B
Westwood Quality SmallCap Fund Inst
Price$20.41
Change+$0.05 (+0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets977.46M
FTHFX vs WHGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. WHGSX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and WHGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. WHGSX (977M). WHGSX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: WHGSX (0.71) vs FTHFX (0.63). FTHFX was incepted earlier than WHGSX: FTHFX (14 years) vs WHGSX (19 years). WHGSX (1.04) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). WHGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 63.00 vs. FTHFX (28.00). WHGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: WHGSX (100000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.23 vs. WHGSX (0.23). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 72.22 vs. WHGSX (13.76).
| FTHFX | WHGSX | FTHFX / WHGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.90 | 70% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.04 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.019 | 6.859 | 73% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 100000 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.1B | 977M | 1,136% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.63 | 0.71 | 89% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.23 | 0.23 | 7,003% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.94 | 4.73 | 866% |
| Returns for 5 years | 72.22 | 13.76 | 525% |
| Returns for 10 years | 279.59 | 93.13 | 300% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement