Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs WHGMX
FTHFX vs WHGMX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs WHGMX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$53.15
Change+$3.45 (+6.94%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.13B
Westwood Quality SMidCap Fund Inst
Price$17.67
Change+$0.77 (+4.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets104.86M
FTHFX vs WHGMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. WHGMX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and WHGMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. WHGMX (105M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than WHGMX: FTHFX (0.63) vs WHGMX (0.40). FTHFX was incepted earlier than WHGMX: FTHFX (14 years) vs WHGMX (20 years). WHGMX (1.07) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). WHGMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. FTHFX (28.00). WHGMX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: WHGMX (100000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.23 vs. WHGMX (8.81). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 72.22 vs. WHGMX (28.69).
| FTHFX | WHGMX | FTHFX / WHGMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.90 | 70% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.07 | 59% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.019 | 8.140 | 62% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 100000 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.1B | 105M | 10,571% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.63 | 0.40 | 160% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.23 | 8.81 | 184% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.94 | 31.59 | 130% |
| Returns for 5 years | 72.22 | 28.69 | 252% |
| Returns for 10 years | 279.59 | 48.23 | 580% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement