Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs WHGCX
FTHFX vs WHGCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs WHGCX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$52.62
Change+$0.17 (+0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.13B
Westwood Quality SmallCap Fund C
Price$19.93
Change+$0.14 (+0.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets969.37M
FTHFX vs WHGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. WHGCX commentary
Jan 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and WHGCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. WHGCX (969M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than WHGCX: FTHFX (0.65) vs WHGCX (0.00). FTHFX was incepted earlier than WHGCX: FTHFX (14 years) vs WHGCX (6 years). WHGCX (1.93) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). WHGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. FTHFX (28.00). WHGCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: WHGCX (1000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.21 vs. WHGCX (-1.29). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 70.24 vs. WHGCX (9.14).
| FTHFX | WHGCX | FTHFX / WHGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.79 | 35% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.93 | 33% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.972 | 6.350 | 63% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.1B | 969M | 1,146% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.65 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.21 | -1.29 | -1,103% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.11 | 5.78 | 815% |
| Returns for 5 years | 70.24 | 9.14 | 769% |
| Returns for 10 years | 275.55 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement