Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs WHGCX
FTHFX vs WHGCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs WHGCX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$50.70
Change+$0.51 (+1.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.13B
Westwood Quality SmallCap Fund C
Price$20.13
Change+$0.31 (+1.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets942.15M
FTHFX vs WHGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. WHGCX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and WHGCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. WHGCX (942M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than WHGCX: FTHFX (0.69) vs WHGCX (0.26). FTHFX was incepted earlier than WHGCX: FTHFX (14 years) vs WHGCX (6 years). WHGCX (1.93) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). WHGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). WHGCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: WHGCX (1000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.44 vs. WHGCX (-13.10). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 81.10 vs. WHGCX (22.46).
| FTHFX | WHGCX | FTHFX / WHGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.79 | 35% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.93 | 33% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.471 | 0.201 | 5,709% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.1B | 942M | 1,178% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.69 | 0.26 | 268% |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.44 | -13.10 | 34% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.81 | 1.95 | 2,039% |
| Returns for 5 years | 81.10 | 22.46 | 361% |
| Returns for 10 years | 171.11 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement