Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs TRZVX
FTHFX vs TRZVX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs TRZVX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$52.62
Change+$0.17 (+0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.13B
T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Value Z
Price$54.50
Change+$0.31 (+0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.04B
FTHFX vs TRZVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. TRZVX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and TRZVX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. TRZVX (9.04B). TRZVX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: TRZVX (1.60) vs FTHFX (0.65). FTHFX was incepted earlier than TRZVX: FTHFX (14 years) vs TRZVX (6 years). TRZVX (0.64) and FTHFX (0.63) have similar cost to investors . TRZVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.40 vs. FTHFX (28.00). TRZVX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: TRZVX (0) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.21 vs. TRZVX (4.92). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 70.24 vs. TRZVX (4.91).
| FTHFX | TRZVX | FTHFX / TRZVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.00 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.64 | 98% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.972 | 6.072 | 65% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.1B | 9.04B | 123% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.65 | 1.60 | 41% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.21 | 4.92 | 289% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.11 | 11.95 | 394% |
| Returns for 5 years | 70.24 | 4.91 | 1,429% |
| Returns for 10 years | 275.55 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers