Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs TRZVX
FTHFX vs TRZVX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs TRZVX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$53.15
Change+$3.45 (+6.94%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.13B
T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Value Z
Price$55.13
Change-$1.08 (-1.92%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.04B
FTHFX vs TRZVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. TRZVX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and TRZVX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. TRZVX (9.04B). TRZVX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: TRZVX (1.52) vs FTHFX (0.63). FTHFX was incepted earlier than TRZVX: FTHFX (14 years) vs TRZVX (6 years). TRZVX (0.64) and FTHFX (0.63) have similar cost to investors . TRZVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.40 vs. FTHFX (28.00). TRZVX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: TRZVX (0) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.23 vs. TRZVX (4.51). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 72.22 vs. TRZVX (5.03).
| FTHFX | TRZVX | FTHFX / TRZVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.00 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.64 | 98% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.019 | 7.299 | 69% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.1B | 9.04B | 123% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.63 | 1.52 | 41% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.23 | 4.51 | 360% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.94 | 6.90 | 593% |
| Returns for 5 years | 72.22 | 5.03 | 1,436% |
| Returns for 10 years | 279.59 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers