Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs TRCSX
FTHFX vs TRCSX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs TRCSX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$50.11
Change+$0.54 (+1.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.26B
T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Index I
Price$17.24
Change+$0.16 (+0.94%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets283.87M
FTHFX vs TRCSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. TRCSX commentary
Sep 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and TRCSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.3B vs. TRCSX (284M). TRCSX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: TRCSX (1.38) vs FTHFX (0.70). FTHFX was incepted earlier than TRCSX: FTHFX (14 years) vs TRCSX (10 years). FTHFX (0.63) is less costly to investors than TRCSX (0.31). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. TRCSX (24.70). TRCSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: TRCSX (500000) vs FTHFX (1000000). TRCSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.78 vs. FTHFX (2.48). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 114.02 vs. TRCSX (66.28).
| FTHFX | TRCSX | FTHFX / TRCSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.14 | 450% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.31 | 203% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.326 | 10.160 | 102% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 500000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.3B | 284M | 3,979% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.70 | 1.38 | 51% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.48 | 9.78 | 25% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.88 | 50.01 | 128% |
| Returns for 5 years | 114.02 | 66.28 | 172% |
| Returns for 10 years | 189.61 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers