Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs TRCSX
FTHFX vs TRCSX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs TRCSX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$43.73
Change-$0.69 (-1.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.91B
T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Index I
Price$14.83
Change-$0.28 (-1.85%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets230.4M
FTHFX vs TRCSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. TRCSX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a StrongBuy and TRCSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 9.91B vs. TRCSX (230M). TRCSX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: TRCSX (1.58) vs FTHFX (0.79). FTHFX was incepted earlier than TRCSX: FTHFX (14 years) vs TRCSX (10 years). FTHFX (0.63) is less costly to investors than TRCSX (0.31). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. TRCSX (24.70). TRCSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: TRCSX (500000) vs FTHFX (1000000). TRCSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.76 vs. FTHFX (-1.78). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 93.55 vs. TRCSX (52.68).
| FTHFX | TRCSX | FTHFX / TRCSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.14 | 450% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.31 | 203% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.721 | -5.240 | 71% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 500000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.91B | 230M | 4,309% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.79 | 1.58 | 50% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.78 | 2.76 | -64% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.46 | 26.09 | 151% |
| Returns for 5 years | 93.55 | 52.68 | 178% |
| Returns for 10 years | 132.30 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement