Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs TRCSX
FTHFX vs TRCSX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs TRCSX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$50.70
Change+$0.51 (+1.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.13B
T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Index I
Price$17.83
Change+$0.33 (+1.89%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets297.78M
FTHFX vs TRCSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. TRCSX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and TRCSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. TRCSX (298M). TRCSX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: TRCSX (1.31) vs FTHFX (0.69). FTHFX was incepted earlier than TRCSX: FTHFX (14 years) vs TRCSX (10 years). FTHFX (0.63) is less costly to investors than TRCSX (0.31). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. TRCSX (24.70). TRCSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: TRCSX (500000) vs FTHFX (1000000). TRCSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.59 vs. FTHFX (-3.97). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 77.79 vs. TRCSX (33.66).
| FTHFX | TRCSX | FTHFX / TRCSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.14 | 450% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.31 | 203% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.625 | 13.930 | 83% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 500000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.1B | 298M | 3,725% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.69 | 1.31 | 53% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.97 | 3.59 | -111% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.00 | 35.95 | 111% |
| Returns for 5 years | 77.79 | 33.66 | 231% |
| Returns for 10 years | 171.48 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement