Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs TISBX
FTHFX vs TISBX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs TISBX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$51.54
Change-$0.53 (-1.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.13B
Nuveen Small Cap Blend Idx R6
Price$26.53
Change-$1.49 (-5.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.76B
FTHFX vs TISBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
A.I.Advisor
published Highlights
Market Cap
The average market capitalization across the group is 7.42B. The market cap for tickers in the group ranges from 3.72B to 11.13B. FTHFX holds the highest valuation in this group at 11.13B. The lowest valued company is TISBX at 3.72B.
High and low price notable news
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the group was 2%. For the same group, the average monthly price growth was 5%, and the average quarterly price growth was 22%. TISBX experienced the highest price growth at 2%, while FTHFX experienced the biggest fall at 2%.
Volume
The average weekly volume growth across all stocks in the group was 0%. For the same stocks of the group, the average monthly volume growth was 0% and the average quarterly volume growth was 0%
Fundamental Analysis Ratings
The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows
Valuation Rating:
P/E Growth Rating:
Price Growth Rating:
SMR Rating:
Profit Risk Rating:
Seasonality Score: (-100 ... +100)
FTHFX vs. TISBX commentary
Dec 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and TISBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. TISBX (3.76B). TISBX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: TISBX (1.55) vs FTHFX (0.69). FTHFX was incepted earlier than TISBX: FTHFX (14 years) vs TISBX (23 years). FTHFX (0.63) is less costly to investors than TISBX (0.06). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 28.00 vs. TISBX (18.00). FTHFX (1000000) and TISBX (1000000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. TISBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.67 vs. FTHFX (7.21). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 81.55 vs. TISBX (25.13).
| FTHFX | TISBX | FTHFX / TISBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.06 | 1,050% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.06 | 1,050% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.641 | 17.583 | 83% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.1B | 3.76B | 295% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.69 | 1.55 | 45% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.21 | 9.67 | 75% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.92 | 40.37 | 119% |
| Returns for 5 years | 81.55 | 25.13 | 324% |
| Returns for 10 years | 196.61 | 86.52 | 227% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement