Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs SZCCX
FTHFX vs SZCCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs SZCCX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$49.02
Change-$0.94 (-1.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.11B
FTHFX vs SZCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. SZCCX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a StrongBuy and SZCCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. SZCCX (1.08B). FTHFX pays higher dividends than SZCCX: FTHFX (0.70) vs SZCCX (0.10). FTHFX was incepted earlier than SZCCX: FTHFX (14 years) vs SZCCX (24 years). SZCCX (1.96) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. SZCCX (29.00). SZCCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: SZCCX (1000) vs FTHFX (1000000). SZCCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.87 vs. FTHFX (-5.33). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 86.83 vs. SZCCX (64.98).
| FTHFX | SZCCX | FTHFX / SZCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.96 | 32% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.96 | 32% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.996 | 3.436 | 291% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.1B | 1.08B | 1,028% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.70 | 0.10 | 672% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.33 | -1.87 | 285% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.85 | 19.39 | 216% |
| Returns for 5 years | 86.83 | 64.98 | 134% |
| Returns for 10 years | 172.84 | 77.70 | 222% |