Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs SZCCX
FTHFX vs SZCCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs SZCCX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$53.32
Change+$0.70 (+1.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.13B
FTHFX vs SZCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. SZCCX commentary
Jan 17, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and SZCCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. SZCCX (1.12B). FTHFX pays higher dividends than SZCCX: FTHFX (0.65) vs SZCCX (0.00). FTHFX was incepted earlier than SZCCX: FTHFX (14 years) vs SZCCX (25 years). SZCCX (1.96) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 28.00 vs. SZCCX (16.00). SZCCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: SZCCX (1000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.08 vs. SZCCX (3.85). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 72.50 vs. SZCCX (37.27).
| FTHFX | SZCCX | FTHFX / SZCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.96 | 32% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.96 | 32% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.355 | 5.004 | 107% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.1B | 1.12B | 994% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.65 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.08 | 3.85 | 365% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.07 | 24.86 | 197% |
| Returns for 5 years | 72.50 | 37.27 | 195% |
| Returns for 10 years | 280.55 | 131.03 | 214% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers