Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs SZCCX
FTHFX vs SZCCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs SZCCX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$49.47
Change+$0.27 (+0.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.08B
FTHFX vs SZCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. SZCCX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and SZCCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. SZCCX (1.04B). FTHFX pays higher dividends than SZCCX: FTHFX (0.69) vs SZCCX (0.10). FTHFX was incepted earlier than SZCCX: FTHFX (14 years) vs SZCCX (24 years). SZCCX (1.96) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. SZCCX (29.00). SZCCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: SZCCX (1000) vs FTHFX (1000000). SZCCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.39 vs. FTHFX (-1.91). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 94.83 vs. SZCCX (76.46).
| FTHFX | SZCCX | FTHFX / SZCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.96 | 32% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.96 | 32% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.917 | 5.603 | 159% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.1B | 1.04B | 1,069% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.69 | 0.10 | 689% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.91 | 4.39 | -43% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.30 | 24.58 | 205% |
| Returns for 5 years | 94.83 | 76.46 | 124% |
| Returns for 10 years | 169.48 | 75.69 | 224% |