Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs SZCCX
FTHFX vs SZCCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs SZCCX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$51.64
Change-$0.19 (-0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.13B
FTHFX vs SZCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. SZCCX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and SZCCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. SZCCX (1.1B). FTHFX pays higher dividends than SZCCX: FTHFX (0.69) vs SZCCX (0.10). FTHFX was incepted earlier than SZCCX: FTHFX (14 years) vs SZCCX (25 years). SZCCX (1.96) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 28.00 vs. SZCCX (16.00). SZCCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: SZCCX (1000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.63 vs. SZCCX (2.35). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 75.57 vs. SZCCX (43.22).
| FTHFX | SZCCX | FTHFX / SZCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.96 | 32% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.96 | 32% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.694 | 3.858 | 355% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.1B | 1.1B | 1,008% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.69 | 0.10 | 667% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.63 | 2.35 | 495% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.29 | 23.91 | 210% |
| Returns for 5 years | 75.57 | 43.22 | 175% |
| Returns for 10 years | 225.13 | 95.25 | 236% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement