Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs SZCAX
FTHFX vs SZCAX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs SZCAX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$49.47
Change+$0.27 (+0.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.08B
FTHFX vs SZCAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. SZCAX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and SZCAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. SZCAX (1.04B). FTHFX pays higher dividends than SZCAX: FTHFX (0.69) vs SZCAX (0.40). FTHFX was incepted earlier than SZCAX: FTHFX (14 years) vs SZCAX (24 years). SZCAX (1.17) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. SZCAX (29.00). SZCAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: SZCAX (1000) vs FTHFX (1000000). SZCAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.46 vs. FTHFX (-1.91). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 94.83 vs. SZCAX (85.16).
| FTHFX | SZCAX | FTHFX / SZCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.17 | 54% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.17 | 54% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.917 | 6.294 | 142% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.1B | 1.04B | 1,069% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.69 | 0.40 | 175% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.91 | 5.46 | -35% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.30 | 28.16 | 179% |
| Returns for 5 years | 94.83 | 85.16 | 111% |
| Returns for 10 years | 169.48 | 98.21 | 173% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers