Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs SSCCX
FTHFX vs SSCCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs SSCCX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$49.02
Change-$0.94 (-1.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.11B
Saratoga Small Capitalization C
Price$0.38
Change-$0.01 (-2.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.13M
FTHFX vs SSCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. SSCCX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a StrongBuy and SSCCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. SSCCX (6.13M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than SSCCX: FTHFX (0.70) vs SSCCX (0.00). FTHFX was incepted earlier than SSCCX: FTHFX (14 years) vs SSCCX (27 years). SSCCX (2.91) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). SSCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 135.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). SSCCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: SSCCX (250) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.33 vs. SSCCX (-67.23). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 86.83 vs. SSCCX (-85.82).
| FTHFX | SSCCX | FTHFX / SSCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 2.91 | 22% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 2.91 | 22% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.996 | 5.405 | 185% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.1B | 6.13M | 181,106% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.70 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.33 | -67.23 | 8% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.85 | -75.47 | -55% |
| Returns for 5 years | 86.83 | -85.82 | -101% |
| Returns for 10 years | 172.84 | -93.62 | -185% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement