Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs SKSZX
FTHFX vs SKSZX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs SKSZX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$43.73
Change-$0.69 (-1.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.91B
AMG GW&K Small Cap Value Z
Price$27.46
Change-$0.55 (-1.96%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets195.06M
FTHFX vs SKSZX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. SKSZX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a StrongBuy and SKSZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 9.91B vs. SKSZX (195M). SKSZX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: SKSZX (1.12) vs FTHFX (0.79). FTHFX was incepted earlier than SKSZX: FTHFX (14 years) vs SKSZX (8 years). SKSZX (0.94) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. SKSZX (24.00). FTHFX has a lower initial minimum investment than SKSZX: FTHFX (1000000) vs SKSZX (5000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.78 vs. SKSZX (-4.12). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 93.55 vs. SKSZX (0.87).
| FTHFX | SKSZX | FTHFX / SKSZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.90 | 70% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.94 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.721 | -9.223 | 40% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 5000000 | 20% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.91B | 195M | 5,082% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.79 | 1.12 | 70% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.78 | -4.12 | 43% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.46 | 8.18 | 482% |
| Returns for 5 years | 93.55 | 0.87 | 10,714% |
| Returns for 10 years | 132.30 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement