Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs SKSZX
FTHFX vs SKSZX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs SKSZX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$51.64
Change-$0.19 (-0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.13B
AMG GW&K Small Cap Value Z
Price$29.54
Change-$0.06 (-0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets209.01M
FTHFX vs SKSZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. SKSZX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and SKSZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. SKSZX (209M). SKSZX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: SKSZX (0.99) vs FTHFX (0.69). FTHFX was incepted earlier than SKSZX: FTHFX (14 years) vs SKSZX (9 years). SKSZX (0.94) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 28.00 vs. SKSZX (24.00). FTHFX has a lower initial minimum investment than SKSZX: FTHFX (1000000) vs SKSZX (5000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.63 vs. SKSZX (-3.84). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 75.57 vs. SKSZX (14.56).
| FTHFX | SKSZX | FTHFX / SKSZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.90 | 70% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.94 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.694 | -2.347 | -583% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 5000000 | 20% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.1B | 209M | 5,311% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.69 | 0.99 | 70% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.63 | -3.84 | -303% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.29 | 17.83 | 282% |
| Returns for 5 years | 75.57 | 14.56 | 519% |
| Returns for 10 years | 225.13 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers