Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs SKSZX
FTHFX vs SKSZX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs SKSZX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$49.02
Change-$0.94 (-1.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.11B
AMG GW&K Small Cap Value Z
Price$30.32
Change-$0.54 (-1.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets207.68M
FTHFX vs SKSZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. SKSZX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a StrongBuy and SKSZX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. SKSZX (208M). SKSZX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: SKSZX (1.01) vs FTHFX (0.70). FTHFX was incepted earlier than SKSZX: FTHFX (14 years) vs SKSZX (9 years). SKSZX (0.94) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. SKSZX (24.00). FTHFX has a lower initial minimum investment than SKSZX: FTHFX (1000000) vs SKSZX (5000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -6.29 vs. SKSZX (-9.73). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 83.31 vs. SKSZX (-8.57).
| FTHFX | SKSZX | FTHFX / SKSZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.90 | 70% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.94 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.926 | 2.017 | 393% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 5000000 | 20% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.1B | 208M | 5,337% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.70 | 1.01 | 70% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.29 | -9.73 | 65% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.76 | 13.92 | 286% |
| Returns for 5 years | 83.31 | -8.57 | -972% |
| Returns for 10 years | 165.67 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers