Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs SKSEX
FTHFX vs SKSEX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs SKSEX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$51.64
Change-$0.19 (-0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.13B
AMG GW&K Small Cap Value N
Price$29.72
Change-$0.07 (-0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets208.37M
FTHFX vs SKSEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. SKSEX commentary
Dec 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and SKSEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. SKSEX (208M). SKSEX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: SKSEX (0.73) vs FTHFX (0.69). FTHFX was incepted earlier than SKSEX: FTHFX (14 years) vs SKSEX (39 years). SKSEX (1.19) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 28.00 vs. SKSEX (24.00). SKSEX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: SKSEX (2000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.63 vs. SKSEX (-3.82). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 75.57 vs. SKSEX (13.83).
| FTHFX | SKSEX | FTHFX / SKSEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.15 | 55% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.19 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 39 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.694 | -2.301 | -595% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2000 | 50,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.1B | 208M | 5,337% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.69 | 0.73 | 94% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.63 | -3.82 | -305% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.29 | 17.36 | 290% |
| Returns for 5 years | 75.57 | 13.83 | 547% |
| Returns for 10 years | 225.13 | -16.52 | -1,363% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers