Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs SKSEX
FTHFX vs SKSEX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs SKSEX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$46.91
Change+$0.37 (+0.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.66B
AMG GW&K Small Cap Value N
Price$29.50
Change+$0.25 (+0.85%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets207.13M
FTHFX vs SKSEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. SKSEX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and SKSEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10.7B vs. SKSEX (207M). SKSEX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: SKSEX (0.81) vs FTHFX (0.76). FTHFX was incepted earlier than SKSEX: FTHFX (14 years) vs SKSEX (38 years). SKSEX (1.19) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. SKSEX (24.00). SKSEX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: SKSEX (2000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.98 vs. SKSEX (1.69). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 102.86 vs. SKSEX (7.59).
| FTHFX | SKSEX | FTHFX / SKSEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.15 | 55% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.19 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 38 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.280 | -3.024 | -108% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2000 | 50,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.7B | 207M | 5,169% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.76 | 0.81 | 95% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.98 | 1.69 | 354% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.75 | 17.17 | 290% |
| Returns for 5 years | 102.86 | 7.59 | 1,356% |
| Returns for 10 years | 151.69 | -27.10 | -560% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement