Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs SCUVX
FTHFX vs SCUVX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs SCUVX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$51.83
Change-$0.06 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.13B
Hartford Schroders US Small Cap Opps A
Price$27.15
Change+$0.02 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets175.99M
FTHFX vs SCUVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. SCUVX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and SCUVX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. SCUVX (176M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than SCUVX: FTHFX (0.69) vs SCUVX (0.00). FTHFX was incepted earlier than SCUVX: FTHFX (14 years) vs SCUVX (20 years). SCUVX (1.40) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). SCUVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. FTHFX (28.00). SCUVX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: SCUVX (2000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.53 vs. SCUVX (-7.05). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 76.22 vs. SCUVX (-3.52).
| FTHFX | SCUVX | FTHFX / SCUVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.35 | 47% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.40 | 45% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.113 | -6.153 | -229% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2000 | 50,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.1B | 176M | 6,307% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.69 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.53 | -7.05 | -178% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.85 | 7.52 | 676% |
| Returns for 5 years | 76.22 | -3.52 | -2,166% |
| Returns for 10 years | 227.11 | 21.73 | 1,045% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement