Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs SBRVX
FTHFX vs SBRVX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs SBRVX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$43.73
Change-$0.69 (-1.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.91B
Segall Bryant & Hamill Sm Cp Val Ret
Price$14.07
Change-$0.28 (-1.95%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets393M
FTHFX vs SBRVX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 9.91B vs. SBRVX (393M). SBRVX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: SBRVX (1.04) vs FTHFX (0.79). FTHFX was incepted earlier than SBRVX: FTHFX (14 years) vs SBRVX (6 years). SBRVX (1.22) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. SBRVX (33.00). SBRVX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: SBRVX (2500) vs FTHFX (1000000). SBRVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.73 vs. FTHFX (-1.78). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 93.55 vs. SBRVX (39.53).
| FTHFX | SBRVX | FTHFX / SBRVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.14 | 55% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.22 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.721 | -5.253 | 71% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.91B | 393M | 2,522% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.79 | 1.04 | 75% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.78 | 1.73 | -103% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.46 | 18.45 | 214% |
| Returns for 5 years | 93.55 | 39.53 | 237% |
| Returns for 10 years | 132.30 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers