Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs SBRVX
FTHFX vs SBRVX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs SBRVX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$51.54
Change-$0.53 (-1.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.13B
Segall Bryant & Hamill Sm Cp Val Ret
Price$15.46
Change-$0.24 (-1.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets401.31M
FTHFX vs SBRVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. SBRVX commentary
Dec 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and SBRVX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. SBRVX (401M). SBRVX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: SBRVX (0.88) vs FTHFX (0.69). FTHFX was incepted earlier than SBRVX: FTHFX (14 years) vs SBRVX (6 years). SBRVX (1.22) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). SBRVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 33.00 vs. FTHFX (28.00). SBRVX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: SBRVX (2500) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.21 vs. SBRVX (-0.89). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 81.55 vs. SBRVX (24.65).
| FTHFX | SBRVX | FTHFX / SBRVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.14 | 55% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.22 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.641 | 5.724 | 256% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.1B | 401M | 2,768% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.69 | 0.88 | 78% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.21 | -0.89 | -810% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.92 | 25.46 | 188% |
| Returns for 5 years | 81.55 | 24.65 | 331% |
| Returns for 10 years | 196.61 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers