Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs SBRVX
FTHFX vs SBRVX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs SBRVX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$49.02
Change-$0.94 (-1.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.11B
Segall Bryant & Hamill Sm Cp Val Ret
Price$15.71
Change-$0.28 (-1.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets414.98M
FTHFX vs SBRVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. SBRVX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a StrongBuy and SBRVX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. SBRVX (415M). SBRVX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: SBRVX (0.90) vs FTHFX (0.70). FTHFX was incepted earlier than SBRVX: FTHFX (14 years) vs SBRVX (6 years). SBRVX (1.22) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. SBRVX (33.00). SBRVX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: SBRVX (2500) vs FTHFX (1000000). SBRVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -3.00 vs. FTHFX (-5.33). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 86.83 vs. SBRVX (38.51).
| FTHFX | SBRVX | FTHFX / SBRVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.14 | 55% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.22 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.996 | 7.677 | 130% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.1B | 415M | 2,675% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.70 | 0.90 | 78% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.33 | -3.00 | 178% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.85 | 24.57 | 170% |
| Returns for 5 years | 86.83 | 38.51 | 225% |
| Returns for 10 years | 172.84 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers