Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs SBRVX
FTHFX vs SBRVX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs SBRVX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$52.62
Change+$0.17 (+0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.13B
Segall Bryant & Hamill Sm Cp Val Ret
Price$16.19
Change+$0.08 (+0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets407.2M
FTHFX vs SBRVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. SBRVX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and SBRVX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. SBRVX (407M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than SBRVX: FTHFX (0.65) vs SBRVX (0.34). FTHFX was incepted earlier than SBRVX: FTHFX (14 years) vs SBRVX (6 years). SBRVX (1.22) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). SBRVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 33.00 vs. FTHFX (28.00). SBRVX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: SBRVX (2500) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.21 vs. SBRVX (9.13). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 70.24 vs. SBRVX (19.68).
| FTHFX | SBRVX | FTHFX / SBRVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.14 | 55% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.22 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.972 | 8.367 | 47% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.1B | 407M | 2,727% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.65 | 0.34 | 194% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.21 | 9.13 | 156% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.11 | 25.22 | 187% |
| Returns for 5 years | 70.24 | 19.68 | 357% |
| Returns for 10 years | 275.55 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers