Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs SBRVX
FTHFX vs SBRVX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs SBRVX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$50.16
Change+$0.61 (+1.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.26B
Segall Bryant & Hamill Sm Cp Val Ret
Price$16.11
Change+$0.27 (+1.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets418.45M
FTHFX vs SBRVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.3B vs. SBRVX (418M). SBRVX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: SBRVX (0.90) vs FTHFX (0.70). FTHFX was incepted earlier than SBRVX: FTHFX (14 years) vs SBRVX (6 years). SBRVX (1.22) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. SBRVX (33.00). SBRVX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: SBRVX (2500) vs FTHFX (1000000). SBRVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.32 vs. FTHFX (8.46). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 103.58 vs. SBRVX (52.40).
| FTHFX | SBRVX | FTHFX / SBRVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.14 | 55% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.22 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.436 | 8.485 | 123% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.3B | 418M | 2,703% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.70 | 0.90 | 78% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.46 | 10.32 | 82% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.24 | 35.85 | 157% |
| Returns for 5 years | 103.58 | 52.40 | 198% |
| Returns for 10 years | 178.48 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers