Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs SBHVX
FTHFX vs SBHVX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs SBHVX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$49.02
Change-$0.94 (-1.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.11B
Segall Bryant & Hamill Sm Cp Val Ins
Price$15.77
Change-$0.28 (-1.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets414.98M
FTHFX vs SBHVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. SBHVX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a StrongBuy and SBHVX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. SBHVX (415M). SBHVX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: SBHVX (1.00) vs FTHFX (0.70). FTHFX was incepted earlier than SBHVX: FTHFX (14 years) vs SBHVX (12 years). SBHVX (1.00) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. SBHVX (33.00). SBHVX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: SBHVX (250000) vs FTHFX (1000000). SBHVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.83 vs. FTHFX (-5.33). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 86.83 vs. SBHVX (39.48).
| FTHFX | SBHVX | FTHFX / SBHVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.99 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.00 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.996 | 7.790 | 128% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250000 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.1B | 415M | 2,675% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.70 | 1.00 | 71% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.33 | -2.83 | 189% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.85 | 25.26 | 166% |
| Returns for 5 years | 86.83 | 39.48 | 220% |
| Returns for 10 years | 172.84 | 56.90 | 304% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers