Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs SBHVX
FTHFX vs SBHVX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs SBHVX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$51.64
Change-$0.19 (-0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.13B
Segall Bryant & Hamill Sm Cp Val Ins
Price$15.38
Change+$0.05 (+0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets389.06M
FTHFX vs SBHVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. SBHVX commentary
Dec 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and SBHVX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. SBHVX (389M). SBHVX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: SBHVX (0.97) vs FTHFX (0.69). FTHFX was incepted earlier than SBHVX: FTHFX (14 years) vs SBHVX (12 years). SBHVX (1.00) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). SBHVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 33.00 vs. FTHFX (28.00). SBHVX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: SBHVX (250000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.63 vs. SBHVX (2.57). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 75.57 vs. SBHVX (19.13).
| FTHFX | SBHVX | FTHFX / SBHVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.99 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.00 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.694 | 3.291 | 416% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250000 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.1B | 389M | 2,853% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.69 | 0.97 | 71% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.63 | 2.57 | 452% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.29 | 25.99 | 193% |
| Returns for 5 years | 75.57 | 19.13 | 395% |
| Returns for 10 years | 225.13 | 60.85 | 370% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers