Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs RYPCX
FTHFX vs RYPCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs RYPCX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$46.91
Change+$0.37 (+0.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.66B
Royce Small-Cap Fund Consult
Price$7.05
Change+$0.05 (+0.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.78B
FTHFX vs RYPCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. RYPCX commentary
Jul 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and RYPCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10.7B vs. RYPCX (1.78B). FTHFX pays higher dividends than RYPCX: FTHFX (0.76) vs RYPCX (0.00). FTHFX was incepted earlier than RYPCX: FTHFX (14 years) vs RYPCX (28 years). RYPCX (1.95) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. RYPCX (37.00). RYPCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: RYPCX (2000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.98 vs. RYPCX (-3.82). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 102.86 vs. RYPCX (10.16).
| FTHFX | RYPCX | FTHFX / RYPCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.95 | 32% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.95 | 32% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.280 | 2.026 | 162% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2000 | 50,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.7B | 1.78B | 601% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.76 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.98 | -3.82 | -157% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.75 | 19.09 | 261% |
| Returns for 5 years | 102.86 | 10.16 | 1,013% |
| Returns for 10 years | 151.69 | -35.91 | -422% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement