Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs RUSRX
FTHFX vs RUSRX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs RUSRX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$46.91
Change+$0.37 (+0.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.66B
Lazard US Systematic Small Cap Eq R6
Price$10.51
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets46.75M
FTHFX vs RUSRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10.7B vs. RUSRX (46.8M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than RUSRX: FTHFX (0.76) vs RUSRX (0.57). FTHFX was incepted earlier than RUSRX: FTHFX (14 years) vs RUSRX (2 years). RUSRX (4.26) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). RUSRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 111.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). FTHFX (1000000) and RUSRX (1000000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.98 vs. RUSRX (1.21).
| FTHFX | RUSRX | FTHFX / RUSRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.99 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 4.26 | 15% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 2 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.280 | -5.655 | -58% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.7B | 46.8M | 22,863% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.76 | 0.57 | 134% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.98 | 1.21 | 492% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.75 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 5 years | 102.86 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | 151.69 | N/A | - |