Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs RLESX
FTHFX vs RLESX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs RLESX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$49.02
Change-$0.94 (-1.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.11B
Russell Inv US Small Cap Equity S
Price$26.36
Change-$0.56 (-2.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets615.68M
FTHFX vs RLESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. RLESX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a StrongBuy and RLESX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. RLESX (616M). RLESX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: RLESX (1.50) vs FTHFX (0.70). FTHFX was incepted earlier than RLESX: FTHFX (14 years) vs RLESX (17 years). RLESX (1.12) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). RLESX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 76.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). RLESX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: RLESX (0) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -6.29 vs. RLESX (-11.49). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 83.31 vs. RLESX (-0.61).
| FTHFX | RLESX | FTHFX / RLESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.08 | 58% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.12 | 56% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.926 | 5.693 | 139% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.1B | 616M | 1,802% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.70 | 1.50 | 47% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.29 | -11.49 | 55% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.76 | 4.33 | 918% |
| Returns for 5 years | 83.31 | -0.61 | -13,591% |
| Returns for 10 years | 165.67 | -1.76 | -9,436% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers