Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs RLESX
FTHFX vs RLESX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs RLESX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$53.15
Change+$3.45 (+6.94%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.13B
Russell Inv US Small Cap Equity S
Price$27.33
Change+$0.77 (+2.90%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets849.99M
FTHFX vs RLESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. RLESX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and RLESX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. RLESX (850M). RLESX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: RLESX (1.07) vs FTHFX (0.63). FTHFX was incepted earlier than RLESX: FTHFX (14 years) vs RLESX (17 years). RLESX (1.12) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). RLESX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 76.00 vs. FTHFX (28.00). RLESX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: RLESX (0) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.23 vs. RLESX (7.10). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 72.22 vs. RLESX (-19.28).
| FTHFX | RLESX | FTHFX / RLESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.08 | 58% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.12 | 56% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.019 | 6.633 | 76% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.1B | 850M | 1,306% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.63 | 1.07 | 59% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.23 | 7.10 | 229% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.94 | 5.89 | 695% |
| Returns for 5 years | 72.22 | -19.28 | -375% |
| Returns for 10 years | 279.59 | 24.79 | 1,128% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement