Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs RLACX
FTHFX vs RLACX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs RLACX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$53.15
Change+$3.45 (+6.94%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.13B
Russell Inv US Small Cap Equity A
Price$26.62
Change+$0.74 (+2.86%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets849.1M
FTHFX vs RLACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. RLACX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and RLACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. RLACX (849M). RLACX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: RLACX (0.85) vs FTHFX (0.63). FTHFX was incepted earlier than RLACX: FTHFX (14 years) vs RLACX (17 years). RLACX (1.37) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). RLACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 76.00 vs. FTHFX (28.00). RLACX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: RLACX (0) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.23 vs. RLACX (6.60). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 72.22 vs. RLACX (-21.02).
| FTHFX | RLACX | FTHFX / RLACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.37 | 46% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.37 | 46% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.019 | 6.565 | 76% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.1B | 849M | 1,307% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.63 | 0.85 | 74% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.23 | 6.60 | 246% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.94 | 4.49 | 912% |
| Returns for 5 years | 72.22 | -21.02 | -344% |
| Returns for 10 years | 279.59 | 21.08 | 1,327% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement