Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs RLACX
FTHFX vs RLACX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs RLACX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$46.91
Change+$0.37 (+0.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.66B
Russell Inv US Small Cap Equity A
Price$24.84
Change+$0.19 (+0.77%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets646.89M
FTHFX vs RLACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. RLACX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and RLACX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10.7B vs. RLACX (647M). RLACX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: RLACX (1.39) vs FTHFX (0.76). FTHFX was incepted earlier than RLACX: FTHFX (14 years) vs RLACX (17 years). RLACX (1.37) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). RLACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 76.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). RLACX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: RLACX (0) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.98 vs. RLACX (-4.62). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 102.86 vs. RLACX (11.47).
| FTHFX | RLACX | FTHFX / RLACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.37 | 46% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.37 | 46% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.280 | -0.161 | -2,041% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.7B | 647M | 1,654% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.76 | 1.39 | 55% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.98 | -4.62 | -129% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.75 | 5.86 | 849% |
| Returns for 5 years | 102.86 | 11.47 | 896% |
| Returns for 10 years | 151.69 | -17.37 | -873% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement