Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs RLACX
FTHFX vs RLACX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs RLACX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$48.37
Change-$0.38 (-0.78%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.99B
Russell Inv US Small Cap Equity A
Price$24.84
Change-$0.16 (-0.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets620.69M
FTHFX vs RLACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. RLACX commentary
Aug 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and RLACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11B vs. RLACX (621M). RLACX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: RLACX (1.38) vs FTHFX (0.74). FTHFX was incepted earlier than RLACX: FTHFX (14 years) vs RLACX (17 years). RLACX (1.37) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). RLACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 76.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). RLACX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: RLACX (0) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.59 vs. RLACX (-7.47). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 89.14 vs. RLACX (1.23).
| FTHFX | RLACX | FTHFX / RLACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.37 | 46% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.37 | 46% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.495 | -0.161 | -4,040% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11B | 621M | 1,771% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.74 | 1.38 | 54% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.59 | -7.47 | -61% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.22 | -7.49 | -497% |
| Returns for 5 years | 89.14 | 1.23 | 7,245% |
| Returns for 10 years | 154.43 | -15.40 | -1,003% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement