Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs RLACX
FTHFX vs RLACX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs RLACX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$43.73
Change-$0.69 (-1.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.91B
Russell Inv US Small Cap Equity A
Price$23.25
Change-$0.45 (-1.90%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets609.87M
FTHFX vs RLACX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. RLACX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a StrongBuy and RLACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 9.91B vs. RLACX (610M). RLACX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: RLACX (1.45) vs FTHFX (0.79). FTHFX was incepted earlier than RLACX: FTHFX (14 years) vs RLACX (17 years). RLACX (1.37) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). RLACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 76.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). RLACX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: RLACX (0) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.78 vs. RLACX (-10.76). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 93.55 vs. RLACX (6.74).
| FTHFX | RLACX | FTHFX / RLACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.37 | 46% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.37 | 46% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.721 | -6.551 | 57% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.91B | 610M | 1,625% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.79 | 1.45 | 54% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.78 | -10.76 | 17% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.46 | 0.65 | 6,097% |
| Returns for 5 years | 93.55 | 6.74 | 1,387% |
| Returns for 10 years | 132.30 | -23.97 | -552% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers