Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs RLACX
FTHFX vs RLACX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs RLACX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$51.83
Change-$0.06 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.13B
Russell Inv US Small Cap Equity A
Price$25.53
Change+$0.07 (+0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets811.53M
FTHFX vs RLACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. RLACX commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and RLACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. RLACX (812M). RLACX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: RLACX (1.26) vs FTHFX (0.69). FTHFX was incepted earlier than RLACX: FTHFX (14 years) vs RLACX (17 years). RLACX (1.37) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). RLACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 76.00 vs. FTHFX (28.00). RLACX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: RLACX (0) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.53 vs. RLACX (1.63). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 76.22 vs. RLACX (-16.85).
| FTHFX | RLACX | FTHFX / RLACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.37 | 46% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.37 | 46% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.113 | 2.613 | 540% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.1B | 812M | 1,367% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.69 | 1.26 | 55% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.53 | 1.63 | 768% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.85 | 11.09 | 459% |
| Returns for 5 years | 76.22 | -16.85 | -452% |
| Returns for 10 years | 227.11 | -0.38 | -59,191% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement