Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs RCSIX
FTHFX vs RCSIX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs RCSIX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$47.67
Change+$0.81 (+1.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.78B
FTHFX vs RCSIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. RCSIX commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and RCSIX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10.8B vs. RCSIX (33.7M). RCSIX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: RCSIX (0.89) vs FTHFX (0.76). FTHFX was incepted earlier than RCSIX: FTHFX (14 years) vs RCSIX (34 years). RCSIX (1.16) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. RCSIX (37.00). RCSIX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: RCSIX (250000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.03 vs. RCSIX (-20.75). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 99.73 vs. RCSIX (-53.71).
| FTHFX | RCSIX | FTHFX / RCSIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.86 | 73% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.16 | 54% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 34 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.954 | -4.887 | -101% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250000 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.8B | 33.7M | 32,047% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.76 | 0.89 | 86% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.03 | -20.75 | -10% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.52 | -24.52 | -186% |
| Returns for 5 years | 99.73 | -53.71 | -186% |
| Returns for 10 years | 152.73 | -59.70 | -256% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement