Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs RCSIX
FTHFX vs RCSIX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs RCSIX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$46.91
Change+$0.37 (+0.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.66B
FTHFX vs RCSIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. RCSIX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and RCSIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10.7B vs. RCSIX (34.1M). RCSIX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: RCSIX (0.89) vs FTHFX (0.76). FTHFX was incepted earlier than RCSIX: FTHFX (14 years) vs RCSIX (34 years). RCSIX (1.16) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. RCSIX (37.00). RCSIX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: RCSIX (250000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.98 vs. RCSIX (-13.84). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 102.86 vs. RCSIX (-51.82).
| FTHFX | RCSIX | FTHFX / RCSIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.86 | 73% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.16 | 54% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 34 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.280 | -4.449 | -74% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250000 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.7B | 34.1M | 31,378% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.76 | 0.89 | 86% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.98 | -13.84 | -43% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.75 | -20.31 | -245% |
| Returns for 5 years | 102.86 | -51.82 | -199% |
| Returns for 10 years | 151.69 | -60.82 | -249% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement