Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs RCSIX
FTHFX vs RCSIX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs RCSIX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$48.37
Change-$0.38 (-0.78%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.99B
FTHFX vs RCSIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. RCSIX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and RCSIX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11B vs. RCSIX (32.7M). RCSIX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: RCSIX (0.88) vs FTHFX (0.74). FTHFX was incepted earlier than RCSIX: FTHFX (14 years) vs RCSIX (34 years). RCSIX (1.16) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. RCSIX (37.00). RCSIX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: RCSIX (250000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.59 vs. RCSIX (-15.68). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 89.14 vs. RCSIX (-56.60).
| FTHFX | RCSIX | FTHFX / RCSIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.86 | 73% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.16 | 54% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 34 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.495 | -3.866 | -168% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250000 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11B | 32.7M | 33,639% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.74 | 0.88 | 84% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.59 | -15.68 | -29% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.22 | -30.60 | -122% |
| Returns for 5 years | 89.14 | -56.60 | -157% |
| Returns for 10 years | 154.43 | -58.77 | -263% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement