Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs RBRCX
FTHFX vs RBRCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs RBRCX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$46.91
Change+$0.37 (+0.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.66B
FTHFX vs RBRCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. RBRCX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and RBRCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10.7B vs. RBRCX (34.1M). RBRCX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: RBRCX (0.85) vs FTHFX (0.76). FTHFX was incepted earlier than RBRCX: FTHFX (14 years) vs RBRCX (9 years). RBRCX (38.30) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. RBRCX (37.00). RBRCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: RBRCX (250000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.98 vs. RBRCX (-13.77). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 102.86 vs. RBRCX (-51.56).
| FTHFX | RBRCX | FTHFX / RBRCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.83 | 76% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 38.30 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.280 | -4.486 | -73% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250000 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.7B | 34.1M | 31,378% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.76 | 0.85 | 90% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.98 | -13.77 | -43% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.75 | -20.04 | -248% |
| Returns for 5 years | 102.86 | -51.56 | -199% |
| Returns for 10 years | 151.69 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement